From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@austin.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/base: error handling fixes
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 08:58:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45250161.4060002@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061005124848.GB6920@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Heiko Carstens wrote:
>>>>> static int __cpuinit topology_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
>>>>> @@ -112,17 +110,18 @@ static int __cpuinit topology_cpu_callba
>>>>> {
>>>>> unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
>>>>> struct sys_device *sys_dev;
>>>>> + int rc = 0;
>>>>> sys_dev = get_cpu_sysdev(cpu);
>>>>> switch (action) {
>>>>> case CPU_ONLINE:
>>>>> - topology_add_dev(sys_dev);
>>>>> + rc = topology_add_dev(sys_dev);
>>>>> break;
>>>>> case CPU_DEAD:
>>>>> topology_remove_dev(sys_dev);
>>>>> break;
>>>>> }
>>>>> - return NOTIFY_OK;
>>>>> + return rc ? NOTIFY_BAD : NOTIFY_OK;
>>>>> }
>>>> Wouldn't that also require that _cpu_up checked the return code when
>>>> doing CPU_ONLINE notification (and clean up on error)?
>>> After all code that gets a CPU_ONLINE notification is not supposed to fail.
>>> For allocating resources while bringing up a cpu CPU_UP_PREPARE is supposed
>>> to be used. That one is allowed to fail.
>> It's a bug no matter how you look at it... I just lessen the impact. :)
>>
>> If someone wants to provide a better fix, let's see the patch...
>
> If sysfs_remove_group() would also work for non-created (-existent) groups
> then the patch below would work. Unfortunately that is not the case. So one
> would have to remember if sysfs_create_group() was done and succeeded before
> calling sysfs_remove_group()...
> There must be an easier way.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/topology.c b/drivers/base/topology.c
> index 3ef9d51..d0056c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/topology.c
ACK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-05 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-04 13:05 [PATCH] drivers/base: error handling fixes Jeff Garzik
2006-10-04 14:44 ` Cornelia Huck
2006-10-04 15:24 ` Cornelia Huck
2006-10-05 8:17 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-10-05 11:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-05 12:48 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-10-05 12:58 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-10-05 13:16 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-10-09 7:29 ` [patch 1/2] sysfs: allow removal of nonexistent sysfs groups Heiko Carstens
2006-10-09 7:40 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-09 7:49 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-10-09 7:30 ` [patch 2/2] cpu topology: various fixes/cleanups Heiko Carstens
2006-10-05 13:15 ` [PATCH] drivers/base: error handling fixes Cornelia Huck
2006-10-05 13:20 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-10-05 13:45 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45250161.4060002@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathanl@austin.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox