public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	xemul@openvz.org, Andrey Savochkin <saw@sw.ru>,
	devel@openvz.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
	Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>,
	CKRM-Tech <ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>, Srivatsa <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
	haveblue@us.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/10] BC: introduce atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave()
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 19:51:16 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <452529F4.4000607@sw.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4525257A.4040609@openvz.org>

Oleg Nesterov noticed to me that the construction like
(used in beancounter patches and free_uid()):

  local_irq_save(flags);
  if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&refcnt, &lock))
	  ...

is not that good for preemtible kernels, since with preemption
spin_lock() can schedule() to reduce latency. However, it won't schedule
if interrupts are disabled.

So this patch introduces atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave() as a logical
counterpart to atomic_dec_and_lock().

Signed-Off-By: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-Off-By: Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>

---

 include/linux/spinlock.h |    6 ++++++
 kernel/user.c            |    5 +----
 lib/dec_and_lock.c       |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- ./include/linux/spinlock.h.dlirq	2006-08-28 10:17:35.000000000 +0400
+++ ./include/linux/spinlock.h	2006-08-28 11:22:37.000000000 +0400
@@ -266,6 +266,12 @@ extern int _atomic_dec_and_lock(atomic_t
 #define atomic_dec_and_lock(atomic, lock) \
 		__cond_lock(lock, _atomic_dec_and_lock(atomic, lock))
 
+extern int _atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave(atomic_t *atomic, spinlock_t *lock,
+		unsigned long *flagsp);
+#define atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave(atomic, lock, flags) \
+		__cond_lock(lock, \
+			_atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave(atomic, lock, &flags))
+
 /**
  * spin_can_lock - would spin_trylock() succeed?
  * @lock: the spinlock in question.
--- ./kernel/user.c.dlirq	2006-07-10 12:39:20.000000000 +0400
+++ ./kernel/user.c	2006-08-28 11:08:56.000000000 +0400
@@ -108,15 +108,12 @@ void free_uid(struct user_struct *up)
 	if (!up)
 		return;
 
-	local_irq_save(flags);
-	if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&up->__count, &uidhash_lock)) {
+	if (atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave(&up->__count, &uidhash_lock, flags)) {
 		uid_hash_remove(up);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uidhash_lock, flags);
 		key_put(up->uid_keyring);
 		key_put(up->session_keyring);
 		kmem_cache_free(uid_cachep, up);
-	} else {
-		local_irq_restore(flags);
 	}
 }
 
--- ./lib/dec_and_lock.c.dlirq	2006-04-21 11:59:36.000000000 +0400
+++ ./lib/dec_and_lock.c	2006-08-28 11:22:08.000000000 +0400
@@ -33,3 +33,22 @@ int _atomic_dec_and_lock(atomic_t *atomi
 }
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(_atomic_dec_and_lock);
+
+/*
+ * the same, but takes the lock with _irqsave
+ */
+int _atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave(atomic_t *atomic, spinlock_t *lock,
+		unsigned long *flagsp)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	if (atomic_add_unless(atomic, -1, 1))
+		return 0;
+#endif
+	spin_lock_irqsave(lock, *flagsp);
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(atomic))
+		return 1;
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, *flagsp);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(_atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave);

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-05 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-05 15:32 [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v5) (added userpages reclamation) Kirill Korotaev
2006-10-05 15:51 ` Kirill Korotaev [this message]
2006-10-05 15:52 ` [PATCH 2/10] BC: kconfig Kirill Korotaev
2006-10-05 15:53 ` [PATCH 3/10] BC: beancounters core (API) Kirill Korotaev
2006-10-05 15:55 ` [PATCH 4/10] BC: context inheriting and changing Kirill Korotaev
2006-10-05 15:56 ` [PATCH 5/10] BC: user interface (syscalls) Kirill Korotaev
2006-10-05 15:57 ` [PATCH 6/10] BC: kernel memory (core) Kirill Korotaev
2006-10-05 15:58 ` [PATCH 7/10] BC: kernel memory (marks) Kirill Korotaev
2006-10-05 15:59 ` [PATCH 8/10] BC: private pages (mappings) accounting (core) Kirill Korotaev
2006-10-05 16:00 ` [PATCH 9/10] BC: physical pages accounting/reclamation (core) Kirill Korotaev
2006-10-05 16:01 ` [PATCH 10/10] BC: user memory accounting (hooks) Kirill Korotaev
2006-10-05 16:04 ` [TOOL] BC: bcctl.c Kirill Korotaev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=452529F4.4000607@sw.ru \
    --to=dev@sw.ru \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=saw@sw.ru \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox