From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: discuss@x86-64.org, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: Please pull x86-64 bug fixes
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:43:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4525445C.6060901@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200610051931.23884.ak@suse.de>
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thursday 05 October 2006 19:17, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>> Does this fix the following issue:
>>
>> PCI: BIOS Bug: MCFG area at e0000000 is not E820-reserved
>> PCI: Not using MMCONFIG.
>>
>> 100% of my x86-64 boxes, AMD or Intel, print this message. And 100% of
>> them work just fine with MMCONFIG.
>
> No.
>
> But it isn't really a issue. Basically everything[1] will work fine anyways.
>
> [1] Only thing you're missing AFAIK is PCI Extended Error Reporting.
Not really true, I have some cards which have >256 bytes of config space.
>> I think this rule is far too drastic for real life.
>
> If you have a better proposal please share. I tried a few others, but none
> of them could handle all the buggy Intel 9x5 boards that hang on any
> mmconfig access (so the "try the first few busses" check already hangs)
>
> Originally I thought
> DMI blacklisting would work, but it's on too many systems for that
> (and Linus rightfully hated it anyways). ACPI checks also didn't work.
> I don't know of any others.
It's a bit disappointing, since I keep getting brand new boxes with
brand new BIOSen, but keep hitting this rule.
AFAICS it's a buggy check, since it continues to needlessly blacklist
working boxes.
My proposal is quite simple: "something that works" -- the current
solution obviously does not.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-05 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-05 17:10 Please pull x86-64 bug fixes Andi Kleen
2006-10-05 17:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-05 17:31 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2006-10-05 17:43 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-10-05 17:53 ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-05 19:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-05 19:42 ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-05 20:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-05 20:10 ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-05 22:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-05 22:52 ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-05 23:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-05 23:21 ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-05 23:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-06 0:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-06 1:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-06 11:03 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-06 16:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-06 16:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-06 22:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-06 22:31 ` Duran, Leo
2006-10-06 23:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-07 5:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-07 2:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-08 20:59 ` Duran, Leo
2006-10-08 22:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-05 22:00 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-05 21:44 ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-06 11:14 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-16 12:21 ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-05 17:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-05 17:27 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2006-10-05 22:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-05 23:05 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4525445C.6060901@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox