Re: [PATCH 3/3] IRQ: Maintain regs pointer globally rather than passing to IRQ handlers

Andrew Morton
2006-10-02T20:57:13Z

On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:43:38 -0400
"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:

> >
> > I think the change is good. But I don't want to maintain this whopper
> > out-of-tree for two months! If we want to do this, we should just smash it
> > in and grit our teeth.
>
> Yes, lets drop it in while we still not reached rc1.

Doing it after -rc1 would be saner, when the tree isn't changing at a
megabyte-per-minute. Give people at least a couple of days to review it,
test it, etc.