From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Martin Bligh <mbligh@mbligh.org>
Cc: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
sukadev@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Panic in pci_call_probe from 2.6.18-mm2 and 2.6.18-mm3
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 13:34:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <452A881E.40706@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <452A85D8.70806@mbligh.org>
Martin Bligh wrote:
> Badari Pulavarty wrote:
>> On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 00:02 -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>>
>>> Not sure if you've seen this already ... catching up on test results.
>>>
>>> This was on NUMA-Q, on both -mm2 and -mm3. -mm1 didn't suffer from this
>>> problem.
>>>
>>> Full logs:
>>>
>>> mm2 - http://test.kernel.org/abat/50727/debug/console.log
>>> mm3 - http://test.kernel.org/abat/51442/debug/console.log
>>>
>>> config - http://test.kernel.org/abat/51442/build/dotconfig
>>>
>>> I'm guessing from the 00000004 that the pcibus_to_node(dev->bus)
>>> is failing because bus->sysdata is NULL. The disassembly and
>>> structure offsets seem to line up for that.
>>>
>>> #define pcibus_to_node(bus) (
>>> (struct pci_sysdata *)((bus)->sysdata))->node
>>>
>>> struct pci_sysdata {
>>> int domain; /* PCI domain */
>>> int node; /* NUMA node */
>>> };
>>>
>>
>>
>> Martin,
>>
>> Jeff moved "node" to a proper field in sysdata, instead
>> of overloading sysdata itself. I think this is causing the
>> problem. I guess we could end up with sysdata = NULL in some
>> cases ? Since you are the NUMA-Q expert, where does sysdata gets set
>> for NUMA-Q ? :)
>>
>> -mm2 changed:
>>
>> #define pcibus_to_node(bus) ((long) (bus)->sysdata)
>>
>> to
>> #define pcibus_to_node(bus) ((struct pci_sysdata *)((bus)->sysdata))-
>>
>>> node
>
> Buggered if I know, that's some strange pci thing ;-)
>
> But can we revert whatever patch that was until it gets fixed, please?
It needs to get fixed, otherwise whose buses of PCI devices disappear on
some machines.
Can you turn on PCI debugging?
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-09 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-08 7:02 Panic in pci_call_probe from 2.6.18-mm2 and 2.6.18-mm3 Martin J. Bligh
2006-10-08 7:49 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-09 17:19 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-09 17:24 ` Martin Bligh
2006-10-09 17:34 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-10-09 18:46 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2006-10-20 17:07 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-10-20 17:37 ` Greg KH
2006-11-01 14:37 ` [PATCH] pci device ensure sysdata initialised v2 Andy Whitcroft
2006-11-08 11:22 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=452A881E.40706@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=sukadev@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox