From: Steve Lord <lord@xfs.org>
To: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Directories > 2GB
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:15:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <452B0240.60203@xfs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061010015512.GQ11034@melbourne.sgi.com>
Hi Dave,
My recollection is that it used to default to on, it was disabled
because it needs to map the buffer into a single contiguous chunk
of kernel memory. This was placing a lot of pressure on the memory
remapping code, so we made it not default to on as reworking the
code to deal with non contig memory was looking like a major
effort.
Steve
David Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 04:53:02PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
>> You might want to think about keeping the directory a little
>> more contiguous than individual disk blocks. XFS does have
>> code in it to allocate the directory in chunks larger than
>> a single file system block. It does not get used on linux
>> because the code was written under the assumption you can
>> see the whole chunk as a single piece of memory which does not
>> work to well in the linux kernel.
>
> This code is enabled and seems to work in Linux. I don't know if it
> passes xfsqa so I don't know how reliable this feature is. TO check
> it all I did was run a quick test on a x86_64 kernel (4k page
> size) using 16k directory blocks (4 pages):
>
> # mkfs.xfs -f -n size=16384 /dev/ubd/1
> .....
> # xfs_db -r -c "sb 0" -c "p dirblklog" /dev/ubd/1
> dirblklog = 2
> # mount /dev/ubd/1 /mnt/xfs
> # for i in `seq 0 1 100000`; do touch fred.$i; done
> # umount /mnt/xfs
> # mount /mnt/xfs
> # ls /mnt/xfs |wc -l
> 100000
> # rm -rf /mnt/xfs/*
> # ls /mnt/xfs |wc -l
> 0
> # umount /mnt/xfs
> #
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-10 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-04 16:56 Directories > 2GB Andreas Dilger
2006-10-04 17:51 ` Dave Kleikamp
2006-10-09 21:53 ` Steve Lord
2006-10-10 1:55 ` David Chinner
2006-10-10 2:15 ` Steve Lord [this message]
2006-10-10 9:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-10 23:31 ` David Chinner
2006-10-11 16:49 ` Steve Lord
2006-10-12 0:26 ` David Chinner
[not found] ` <452D2086.2020204__28695.6273987473$1160585745$gmane$org@xfs.org>
2006-10-16 18:17 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=452B0240.60203@xfs.org \
--to=lord@xfs.org \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox