Re: Can context switches be faster?

John Richard Moser
2006-10-12T20:36:58Z

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> ther uniprocessor machines.
>> That's a load more descriptive :D
>>
>> 0.890 uS, 0.556uS/cycle, that's barely 2 cycles you know. (Pentium M)
>> PPC performs similarly, 1 cycle should be about 1uS.
>>
>>> Chris
>
> you have your units off; 1 cycle is 1 nS not 1 uS (or 0.556 nS for the
> pM)

Ah, right right. Nano is a billion, micro is a million. How did I get
that mixed up.

So that's barely two THOUSAND cycles. Which is closer to what I
expected (i.e., not instant)

>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

- --
We will enslave their women, eat their children and rape their
cattle!
-- Bosc, Evil alien overlord from the fifth dimension
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=HqrS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----