public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Richard Moser <nigelenki@comcast.net>
To: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Can context switches be faster?
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:23:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <452EA441.6070703@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <452E9E47.8070306@nortel.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Chris Friesen wrote:
> John Richard Moser wrote:
> 
>> Linux ported onto the L4-Iguana microkernel is reported to be faster
>> than the monolith[1]; it's not like microkernels are faster, but the
>> L4-Iguana apparently just has super awesome context switching code:
>>
>>    Wombat's context-switching overheads as measured by lmbench on an
>>    XScale processor are up to thirty times less than those of native
>>    Linux, thanks to Wombat profiting from the implementation of fast
>>    context switches in L4-embedded.
> 
> The Xscale is a fairly special beast, and it's context-switch times are
> pretty slow by default.
> 
> Here are some context-switch times from lmbench on a modified 2.6.10
> kernel. Times are in microseconds:
> 
> cpu        clock speed    context switch   
> pentium-M    1.8GHz        0.890
> dual-Xeon    2GHz        7.430
> Xscale        700MHz        108.2
> dual 970FX    1.8GHz        5.850
> ppc 7447    1GHz        1.720
> 
> Reducing the Xscale time by a factor of 30 would basically bring it into
> line with the other uniprocessor machines.
> 

That's a load more descriptive :D

0.890 uS, 0.556uS/cycle, that's barely 2 cycles you know.  (Pentium M)
PPC performs similarly, 1 cycle should be about 1uS.

> Chris
> 

- --
    We will enslave their women, eat their children and rape their
    cattle!
                  -- Bosc, Evil alien overlord from the fifth dimension
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=pvD8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-12 20:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-12 15:44 Can context switches be faster? John Richard Moser
2006-10-12 15:53 ` John Richard Moser
2006-10-12 17:19 ` Russell King
2006-10-12 18:25   ` John Richard Moser
2006-10-12 18:37     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-12 18:56       ` John Richard Moser
2006-10-12 19:02         ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-13 11:05       ` James Courtier-Dutton
2006-10-13 14:51         ` Chase Venters
2006-10-12 18:20 ` Phillip Susi
2006-10-12 18:29   ` John Richard Moser
2006-10-13  2:53     ` Andrew James Wade
2006-10-13  5:29       ` John Richard Moser
2006-10-13 16:56         ` Andrew James Wade
2006-10-13 17:24           ` John Richard Moser
2006-10-12 19:57 ` Chris Friesen
2006-10-12 20:23   ` John Richard Moser [this message]
2006-10-12 20:29     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-12 20:36       ` John Richard Moser
2006-10-12 20:35     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-10-13 23:32       ` Andreas Mohr
2006-10-13 23:47         ` David Lang
2006-10-14  0:14         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-10-14  0:30         ` Alan Cox
2006-10-14  0:14           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=452EA441.6070703@comcast.net \
    --to=nigelenki@comcast.net \
    --cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox