public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
	"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Strange entries in /proc/acpi/thermal_zone for Thinkpad X60
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 21:57:43 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <452F0EB7.2060508@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa.P/oAhFV0AVrh8PKSKzP+xVGih2s@ifi.uio.no>

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> I have a Thinkpad X60 with an Intel Core Duo T2400.  In 
> /proc/acpi/thermal_zone, I'm getting two subdirectories, each with their 
> own set of files:
> 

So your machine has two thermal zones..

> The interesting thing is that the two sets of files are not consistent - 
> sometimes they don't even show the same temperature.

I would expect they wouldn't, otherwise there would be no reason for the 
BIOS people to set up two thermal zones..

> 
> The reason I'm interested in this is that I think it's behind some of my 
> cpufreq problems.  Sometimes the kernel decides that I just can't raise 
> the max frequency above 1GHz, because its been thermally limited (I've 
> put printks in to confirm that its the ACPI thermal limit on the policy 
> notifier chain which is limiting the max speed).  It seems to me that 
> having a thermal zone for each core is a BIOS bug, since they're really 
> the same chip, but the THM1 entries should be ignored.  I don't believe 

How do you know they are one for each core? ACPI thermal zones can be 
anywhere in the machine that needs OS-controlled cooling. Could be the 
CPU heatsink, voltage regulator, or someplace else.

> the CPU has ever approached either 97 C, let alone 127; while I put it 
> under a fair amount of load, it is sitting on a desktop with no airflow 
> obstructions, so if it really is overheating it suggests a serious 
> design problem with the hardware.
> 
> But I'm just speculating; I'm not really sure what all this means.  Any 
> clues?

I think we need more information to decide what is going on here.. what 
temperatures are registering in the thermal zones when the CPU clock is 
being limited?

-- 
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/


       reply	other threads:[~2006-10-13  3:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <fa.P/oAhFV0AVrh8PKSKzP+xVGih2s@ifi.uio.no>
2006-10-13  3:57 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2006-10-13  4:28   ` Strange entries in /proc/acpi/thermal_zone for Thinkpad X60 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-10-13 18:10     ` Tomasz Torcz
2006-10-12 22:19 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-10-13  4:53 ` Len Brown
2006-10-13 14:44 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=452F0EB7.2060508@shaw.ca \
    --to=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox