bzip2 tarball 2.6.19-rc2 packaged wrong?

bzip2 tarball 2.6.19-rc2 packaged wrong?

[Shawn Starr]

Linus, something in git  broke the prepackaged tarball/bzip2 generation?

$ tar -jxvf linux-2.6.19-rc2.tar.bz2
linux-2.6.19-rc2.gitignore
linux-2.6.19-rc2COPYING
linux-2.6.19-rc2CREDITS
linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/
linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/00-INDEX
linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/ABI/
linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/ABI/README

-rc1 was ok.

Anyone else notice this?

Thanks, 
Shawn.

Re: bzip2 tarball 2.6.19-rc2 packaged wrong?

[Grant Coady]

On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 23:36:20 -0400, Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> wrote:

>Linus, something in git  broke the prepackaged tarball/bzip2 generation?
>
>$ tar -jxvf linux-2.6.19-rc2.tar.bz2
>linux-2.6.19-rc2.gitignore
>linux-2.6.19-rc2COPYING
>linux-2.6.19-rc2CREDITS
>linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/
>linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/00-INDEX
>linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/ABI/
>linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/ABI/README
>
>-rc1 was ok.
>
>Anyone else notice this?

I download and running the .bz2 patch against 2.6.18 okay, no try full 
tarball.

Grant.

Re: bzip2 tarball 2.6.19-rc2 packaged wrong?

[Rene Scharfe]

Shawn Starr schrieb:
> Linus, something in git  broke the prepackaged tarball/bzip2 generation?
> 
> $ tar -jxvf linux-2.6.19-rc2.tar.bz2
> linux-2.6.19-rc2.gitignore
> linux-2.6.19-rc2COPYING
> linux-2.6.19-rc2CREDITS
> linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/
> linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/00-INDEX
> linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/ABI/
> linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/ABI/README
> 
> -rc1 was ok.

Perhaps tar generation has been switched to using git-archive instead of
git-tar-tree?  There's an, admittedly, subtle difference in how the two
handle prefixes/basedirs.  The following two commands do the same:

   $ git-tar-tree rev basedir
   $ git-archive --prefix=basedir/ rev

If you use --prefix and you want a base directory then you have to
provide your own slash (basedir = prefix + path_separator).

René

Re: bzip2 tarball 2.6.19-rc2 packaged wrong?

[Linus Torvalds]

On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Shawn Starr wrote:
>
> Linus, something in git  broke the prepackaged tarball/bzip2 generation?

Sorry, yes.

I switched over my "release-script" that generates the tar-balls and 
patches to use the new syntax for "git tar-tree" (now "git archive"), and 
I screwed up by not having the slash in the prefix.

The old git-tar-tree would add the slash to the prefix automatically, 
git-archive does not. Which is arguably a bug in git-archive. Oh, well.

I'll re-generate the tar-file.

		Linus