public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Constantine Gavrilov <constg@qlusters.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Would SSI clustering extensions be of interest to kernel community?
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:47:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4533C596.5060804@qlusters.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4533B177.7030004@gmail.com>

Please see inline...

Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:

>
> I am interested in seeing the changes. I am right now working on 
> getting parts of OpenSSI (www.openssi.org)
> changes merged  upstream. Bruce Walker of the OpenSSI project have a 
> design of implementing cluster wide procs. The
> same doc can be found on www.openssi.org website. The paper talks 
> about how to implement cluster wide proccess model
> without requiring home/deputy concept. But yes it require some core 
> kernel changes. But should be Conditionally enabled
> like selinux. So overhead for non cluster users should be nill.

I am personally not interested in making intrusive kernel changes even 
if it yields in true "single-system image". I want very small changes 
(preferrably none).

>
> Regarding my work you can see the status here
> http://git.openssi.org/~kvaneesh/gitweb.cgi?p=ci-to-linus.git;a=summary
>
> It only gets the ICS changes. That means it introduce a transport 
> independent kernel cluster framework. Right now it supports two 
> interconnect IPV4 and infiniband verbs.

We also have transport abstraction layer and transport plugins for 
TCP/IP, SDP (Infiniband and possibly others), and SCI (Dolphin).

> I am planning on taking the CFS changes. That should bring in 
> clusterwide shared memory too. The way it was done in OpenSSI
> was to hook a new nopage() function for CFS so that when we page 
> fault, we bring the pages from other node.So i am not sure whether
> one need a VM hook for getting clusterwide shared memory. But without 
> seeing the code i am clueless.
>
Nopage will be called if there is no pte. That means, with just nopage 
you cannot implement RO-RW transition. If you use nopage only, you 
cannot have multiple readers, because you cannot invalidate all other 
readers if one reader goes read-write. Thus nopage allows single reader 
or single writer whle the page fault hook allows multiple readers and 
single writer.

-- 
----------------------------------------
Constantine Gavrilov
Kernel Developer
Qlusters Software Ltd
1 Azrieli Center, Tel-Aviv
Phone: +972-3-6081977
Fax:   +972-3-6081841
----------------------------------------


  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-16 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-16 12:49 Would SSI clustering extensions be of interest to kernel community? Constantine Gavrilov
2006-10-16 13:54 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-16 14:10   ` Would SSI clustering extensions be of interest to kernelcommunity? Constantine Gavrilov
     [not found]   ` <45339234.4050400@qlusters.com>
2006-10-16 14:44     ` Alan Cox
2006-10-16 13:57 ` Would SSI clustering extensions be of interest to kernel community? Diego Calleja
2006-10-16 14:24 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-10-16 16:21 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2006-10-16 17:47   ` Constantine Gavrilov [this message]
2006-10-17 10:56     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2006-10-23  8:17 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4533C596.5060804@qlusters.com \
    --to=constg@qlusters.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox