From: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: AIO, DIO fsx tests failures on 2.6.19-rc1-mm1
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:38:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4535698A.4050406@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061017161014.756e8a97.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:31:49 -0700
> Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:38:19 -0700
>>> Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> So the answer is that -rc1-mm1 doesn't quite have the most recent
>>>>> version of this patch. Grab the final patch at the end of this post
>>>>> from Andrew:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/11/234
>>>>>
>>>>> It fixes up a misunderstanding that came from
>>>>> generic_file_buffered_write()'s habit of adding its 'written' input into
>>>>> the amount of bytes it announces having written in its return value.
>>>>>
>>>>> From mm-commits it looks like -mm2 will have the full patch.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Hmm.. with that patch applied, I still have fsx failures.
>>>> This time read() returning -EINVAL. Are there any other fixes
>>>> missing in -mm ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Probably. I need to get off butt and prepare rc2-mm1.
>>>
>>> The below is the full patch against 2.6.19-rc2. Please test this version.
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> When direct-io falls back to buffered write, it will just leave the dirty data
>>> floating about in pagecache, pending regular writeback.
>>>
>>> But normal direct-io semantics are that IO is synchronous, and that it leaves
>>> no pagecache behind.
>>>
>>> So change the fallback-to-buffered-write code to sync the file region and to
>>> then strip away the pagecache, just as a regular direct-io write would do.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Okay. Finally tracked down the problem I am running into.
>> This happens only on reiserfs
>>
>> # /root/fsx-linux -N 10000 -o 128000 -r 2048 -w 4096 -Z -R -W
>> jnk
>> mapped writes DISABLED
>> truncating to largest ever: 0x32740
>> truncating to largest ever: 0x39212
>> truncating to largest ever: 0x3bae9
>> truncating to largest ever: 0x3c1e3
>> truncating to largest ever: 0x3d1cd
>> truncating to largest ever: 0x3e8b8
>> truncating to largest ever: 0x3ed14
>> truncating to largest ever: 0x3f9c2
>> truncating to largest ever: 0x3ff9f
>> doread: read: Invalid argument
>> Segmentation fault
>>
>> Here is the strace for it
>> ..
>> ftruncate(3, 2721) = 0
>> fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2721, ...}) = 0
>> lseek(3, 0, SEEK_END) = 2721
>> fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2721, ...}) = 0
>> lseek(3, 0, SEEK_END) = 2721
>> fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2721, ...}) = 0
>> lseek(3, 0, SEEK_END) = 2721
>> lseek(3, 0, SEEK_SET) = 0
>> read(3, 0x50a800, 2048) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
>>
>> reiserfs getblock() is returing -EINVAL. There is comment in the code
>> about tail handling and returning EINVAL. BTW, this is not a -mm
>> issue, it happens on mainline too...
>>
>>
>
> Does it fail in mainline, or only in
> mainline+direct-io-sync-and-invalidate-file-region-when-falling-back-to-buffered-write.patch?
>
>
It fails on mailine (2.6.19-rc1). I will double check my tree just in case..
Thanks,
Badari
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-17 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-16 15:42 AIO, DIO fsx tests failures on 2.6.19-rc1-mm1 Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-16 17:51 ` Zach Brown
2006-10-16 17:59 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-16 20:13 ` Zach Brown
2006-10-16 20:38 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-16 20:59 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-16 21:21 ` Zach Brown
2006-10-17 22:31 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-17 23:10 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-17 23:38 ` Badari Pulavarty [this message]
2006-10-18 15:44 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4535698A.4050406@us.ibm.com \
--to=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox