public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Please pull x86 tree
@ 2006-10-21 16:44 Andi Kleen
  2006-10-21 17:51 ` [discuss] " Muli Ben-Yehuda
  2006-10-21 19:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2006-10-21 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: torvalds; +Cc: linux-kernel, discuss


Linus, please pull from

  git://one.firstfloor.org/home/andi/git/linux-2.6 for-linus

These are all accumulated bug fixes for x86-64 and i386 and should
be all pretty safe.

The only thing that isn't a clear bug fix is the dwarf2 unwinder
speedup -- i'm including that on popular demand because it fixes
a serious performance regression with lockdep.

There are also some reverts included where it turned out that
the change wasn't that great an idea.

Andi Kleen:
      i386: Update defconfig
      x86: Use -maccumulate-outgoing-args
      x86-64: Revert interrupt backlink changes
      i386: Disable nmi watchdog on all ThinkPads
      x86: Revert new unwind kernel stack termination
      x86-64: Revert timer routing behaviour back to 2.6.16 state

Andrew Morton:
      i386: fix .cfi_signal_frame copy-n-paste error

bibo,mao:
      x86-64: x86_64 add NX mask for PTE entry

Corey Minyard:
      x86-64: Fix for arch/x86_64/pci/Makefile CFLAGS

Eric W. Biederman:
      x86-64: Use irq_domain in ioapic_retrigger_irq
      x86-64: Put more than one cpu in TARGET_CPUS

Jan Beulich:
      x86-64: Speed up dwarf2 unwinder
      x86-64: Fix ENOSYS in system call tracing

Jeremy Fitzhardinge:
      i386: Fix fake return address

keith mannthey:
      x86-64: x86_64 hot-add memory srat.c fix

Vivek Goyal:
      x86-64: fix page align in e820 allocator
      x86-64: Overlapping program headers in physical addr space fix

Yinghai Lu:
      x86-64: typo in __assign_irq_vector when updating pos for vector and offset

 Makefile                          |    1 
 arch/i386/Makefile                |    8 +
 arch/i386/defconfig               |   30 ++-
 arch/i386/kernel/head.S           |    2 
 arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c            |   10 +
 arch/i386/kernel/process.c        |    6 -
 arch/x86_64/Makefile              |    4 
 arch/x86_64/kernel/e820.c         |   14 +-
 arch/x86_64/kernel/early-quirks.c |    9 +
 arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S        |   10 -
 arch/x86_64/kernel/genapic_flat.c |    2 
 arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c      |   15 +-
 arch/x86_64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S  |    3 
 arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c             |    4 
 arch/x86_64/pci/Makefile          |    2 
 drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c       |   20 ++
 include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h |   16 ++
 include/asm-x86_64/pgtable.h      |    1 
 include/asm-x86_64/proto.h        |    2 
 include/linux/dmi.h               |    2 
 include/linux/unwind.h            |    2 
 init/main.c                       |    1 
 kernel/unwind.c                   |  318 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 23 files changed, 385 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [discuss] Please pull x86 tree
  2006-10-21 16:44 Please pull x86 tree Andi Kleen
@ 2006-10-21 17:51 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
  2006-10-21 18:14   ` Andi Kleen
  2006-10-21 19:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Muli Ben-Yehuda @ 2006-10-21 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: torvalds, linux-kernel, discuss

On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 06:44:06PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> Linus, please pull from
> 
>   git://one.firstfloor.org/home/andi/git/linux-2.6 for-linus
> 
> These are all accumulated bug fixes for x86-64 and i386 and should
> be all pretty safe.
> 
> The only thing that isn't a clear bug fix is the dwarf2 unwinder
> speedup -- i'm including that on popular demand because it fixes
> a serious performance regression with lockdep.

It would've been good to get the Calgary bug-fix in this
series... next one, please?

Cheers,
Muli


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [discuss] Please pull x86 tree
  2006-10-21 17:51 ` [discuss] " Muli Ben-Yehuda
@ 2006-10-21 18:14   ` Andi Kleen
  2006-10-21 19:41     ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2006-10-21 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: discuss; +Cc: Muli Ben-Yehuda, torvalds, linux-kernel

On Saturday 21 October 2006 19:51, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 06:44:06PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > 
> > Linus, please pull from
> > 
> >   git://one.firstfloor.org/home/andi/git/linux-2.6 for-linus
> > 
> > These are all accumulated bug fixes for x86-64 and i386 and should
> > be all pretty safe.
> > 
> > The only thing that isn't a clear bug fix is the dwarf2 unwinder
> > speedup -- i'm including that on popular demand because it fixes
> > a serious performance regression with lockdep.
> 
> It would've been good to get the Calgary bug-fix in this
> series... next one, please?

You said it wasn't critical and I only sent critical issues

-Andi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [discuss] Please pull x86 tree
  2006-10-21 18:14   ` Andi Kleen
@ 2006-10-21 19:41     ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Muli Ben-Yehuda @ 2006-10-21 19:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: discuss, torvalds, linux-kernel

On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 08:14:48PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Saturday 21 October 2006 19:51, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 06:44:06PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > 
> > > Linus, please pull from
> > > 
> > >   git://one.firstfloor.org/home/andi/git/linux-2.6 for-linus
> > > 
> > > These are all accumulated bug fixes for x86-64 and i386 and should
> > > be all pretty safe.
> > > 
> > > The only thing that isn't a clear bug fix is the dwarf2 unwinder
> > > speedup -- i'm including that on popular demand because it fixes
> > > a serious performance regression with lockdep.
> > 
> > It would've been good to get the Calgary bug-fix in this
> > series... next one, please?
> 
> You said it wasn't critical and I only sent critical issues

You asked if it should go into 2.6.19 and I said it should. I also
said it's not critical, by which I meant "it doesn't need to go in
*right now*, it can wait for the next regularly-scheduled
patchset". Sorry about the confusion.

Thanks,
Muli

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Please pull x86 tree
  2006-10-21 16:44 Please pull x86 tree Andi Kleen
  2006-10-21 17:51 ` [discuss] " Muli Ben-Yehuda
@ 2006-10-21 19:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge @ 2006-10-21 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: torvalds, linux-kernel, discuss

Andi Kleen wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge:
>       i386: Fix fake return address
>   

I think this should only make a difference with the PDA tree applied.

    J

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-21 19:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-10-21 16:44 Please pull x86 tree Andi Kleen
2006-10-21 17:51 ` [discuss] " Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-21 18:14   ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-21 19:41     ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-21 19:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox