* most linux friendly motherboard chipset
@ 2006-10-27 23:32 Alex Davis
2006-10-28 11:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-28 23:05 ` Bill Davidsen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alex Davis @ 2006-10-27 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I'm preparing to build a brand new 64-bit machine, I am currently leaning toward AMD 64x2.
I've read that NVidia, along with (silent) data corruption issues, can be a bit of a pain
to get working under Linux. Anyone have any experience with ULi, ATI, or SiS?
Note: I'm not entirely ruling out Intel.
I code, therefore I am
____________________________________________________________________________________
Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited
(http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: most linux friendly motherboard chipset
2006-10-27 23:32 most linux friendly motherboard chipset Alex Davis
@ 2006-10-28 11:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-28 23:05 ` Bill Davidsen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2006-10-28 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Davis; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 04:32:23PM -0700, Alex Davis wrote:
> I'm preparing to build a brand new 64-bit machine, I am currently leaning toward AMD 64x2.
> I've read that NVidia, along with (silent) data corruption issues, can be a bit of a pain
> to get working under Linux. Anyone have any experience with ULi, ATI, or SiS?
>
> Note: I'm not entirely ruling out Intel.
If you don't want builtin graphics and prefer AMD Nvidia seems to be a fair
choice.
If you however want builtin-in graphics there absolutely no way around
intel. In fact if you want to do anything graphics-related with Linux
and intel graphics (which only comes built-in) is the only sane choice.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: most linux friendly motherboard chipset
2006-10-27 23:32 most linux friendly motherboard chipset Alex Davis
2006-10-28 11:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2006-10-28 23:05 ` Bill Davidsen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bill Davidsen @ 2006-10-28 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Davis, Kernel Mailing List
Alex Davis wrote:
> I'm preparing to build a brand new 64-bit machine, I am currently leaning toward AMD 64x2.
> I've read that NVidia, along with (silent) data corruption issues, can be a bit of a pain
> to get working under Linux. Anyone have any experience with ULi, ATI, or SiS?
>
> Note: I'm not entirely ruling out Intel.
I have had good luck with ASUS boards, the Intel chipset, and either the
provided graphics or ATI (I don't like the binary nVidia drivers). I am
just ordering one this weekend, and I'm going with the cheap PentiumD
930 CPU because the quad core units will be out in the spring, and I can
go with that without tying up money in a fast CPU now.
The Core2Duo is faster than AMD (today), has the hardware VM support,
has 64 bit. And most of my clients are running Intel, which is some
consideration regarding support expertise.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Obscure bug of 2004: BASH BUFFER OVERFLOW - if bash is being run by a
normal user and is setuid root, with the "vi" line edit mode selected,
and the character set is "big5," an off-by-one errors occurs during
wildcard (glob) expansion.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-28 23:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-10-27 23:32 most linux friendly motherboard chipset Alex Davis
2006-10-28 11:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-28 23:05 ` Bill Davidsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox