From: Marc Perkel <marc@perkel.com>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Hardware Problem - Asus A8N-VM CSM
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 21:05:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4544287C.409@perkel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4543E457.80203@tmr.com>
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Marc Perkel wrote:
>>
>>
>> Langsdorf, Mark wrote:
>>>>> The problem. 2 out of the 4 sees all 4 gigs of ram. The other 2
>>>>> see only 2.8 gigs of ram. And it's hardware related because in the
>>>>> bios setup the ones that show 2.8 show it in the bios.
>>>>>
>>>>> The motherboards were not prchased at the same time. All have
>>>>> different brands of ram. And the processors are different. The 2
>>>>> that don't see all the ram are the newest ones.
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried swapping ram between one that saw 2.8 gigs and one that
>>>>> saw 4 gigs and the problem stays with the motherboard.
>>>>> I haven't yet swapped out the processors.
>>>>>
>>>>> So - I'm a little stumped. Can someone point me in the right
>>>>> direction?
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Usually, missing memory comes from the PCI I/O hole, or the
>>> IOMMU/AGP/framebuffer overlays. Does your BIOS have an
>>> options for creating a memory hole or hoisting memory? If
>>> so, are the settings between the 4G machines different from
>>> the 2.8G machines?
>>>
>>> Also, do you have an IOMMU aperture enabled and if so, how
>>> large?
>>>
>>> Are there any hardware differences between the systems, like
>>> different AGP or PCI graphics cards?
>>>
>>>
>>>> Answering my own question perhaps. Could it be related to whether
>>>> or not the processor is a "revision e" chip?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Possibly, but I'd expect the RevE parts to see more DRAM than
>>> the earlier parts.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I fixed the problem. It wasn't a Revision E issue after all. I just
>> pulled the battery and when it came up clean it saw all the memory.
>> Thanks for your help.
>>
> Would have been interesting to use the "reset to factory defaults"
> option, just to see if some bit isn't set to known state doing that.
>
Actually that's what it tuened out to be. It had nothing to do with
Revision E.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-29 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-26 13:30 Hardware Problem - Asus A8N-VM CSM Marc Perkel
2006-10-26 14:34 ` Marc Perkel
2006-10-26 16:33 ` Langsdorf, Mark
2006-10-27 16:41 ` Marc Perkel
2006-10-28 23:14 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-10-29 4:05 ` Marc Perkel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4544287C.409@perkel.com \
--to=marc@perkel.com \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox