From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>
To: Carlos Aguiar <carlos.aguiar@indt.org.br>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com,
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>,
ilias.biris@indt.org.br
Subject: Re: [patch 1/6] [RFC] Add MMC Password Protection (lock/unlock) support V5
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:26:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <454473B0.8040901@drzeus.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061020165131.681329000@localhost.localdomain>
Carlos Aguiar wrote:
> When a card is locked, only commands from the "basic" and "lock card" classes
> are accepted. To be able to use the other commands, the card must be unlocked
> first.
>
> This patch prevents the block driver from trying to run privileged class
> commands on locked MMC cards, which will fail anyway.
>
Incorrect commit message. It stops driver probes (all of them).
> 20 11:41:54.000000000 -0400
> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ struct mmc_host {
> unsigned long caps; /* Host capabilities */
>
> #define MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA (1 << 0) /* Can the host do 4 bit transfers */
> +#define MMC_CAP_LOCK_UNLOCK (1 << 1) /* Host password support capability */
>
> /* host specific block data */
> unsigned int max_seg_size; /* see blk_queue_max_segment_size */
>
>
You need to rebase your patch set on a more recent kernel. This won't
apply cleanly.
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-29 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20061020164914.012378000@localhost.localdomain>
2006-10-23 6:03 ` [patch 0/6] [RFC] Add MMC Password Protection (lock/unlock) support V5 Pierre Ossman
2006-10-23 16:44 ` Russell King
[not found] ` <20061020165131.681329000@localhost.localdomain>
2006-10-29 9:26 ` Pierre Ossman [this message]
[not found] ` <20061020165134.378993000@localhost.localdomain>
2006-10-29 9:31 ` [patch 2/6] " Pierre Ossman
[not found] ` <20061020165135.162482000@localhost.localdomain>
2006-10-29 9:49 ` [patch 3/6] " Pierre Ossman
2006-10-30 2:06 ` David Brownell
[not found] ` <20061020165135.852337000@localhost.localdomain>
2006-10-29 9:52 ` [patch 4/6] " Pierre Ossman
[not found] ` <20061020165136.664879000@localhost.localdomain>
2006-10-29 9:57 ` [patch 5/6] " Pierre Ossman
[not found] ` <20061020165139.911232000@localhost.localdomain>
2006-10-29 9:57 ` [patch 6/6] " Pierre Ossman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=454473B0.8040901@drzeus.cx \
--to=drzeus-list@drzeus.cx \
--cc=carlos.aguiar@indt.org.br \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=ilias.biris@indt.org.br \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox