Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc1 full] drivers: add LCD support

Franck Bui-Huu
2006-10-23T17:15:12Z

On 10/23/06, Miguel Ojeda <maxextreme@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, we are sure. AFAIK there is no need to lock when it is a fbdev.
> The older version were "alone" drivers: they needed to lock because
> they used fops and they exported functions.
>

ok, so no other driver than fb could use 'cfag12864b_buffer'. Maybe
I'm missing something but why did you split your fb driver into
cfag12864b.c and cfag12864fb.c ?

BTW, 'cfag12864b_cache' could have been static...

Franck