From: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18 is problematic in VMware
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:33:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45480777.6070908@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0610311551370.6900@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> My experience with VMware on several recent processors (mostly P-M family)
>> is that it crawls unless I force this first:
>> echo 1 > /sys/module/processor/parameters/max_cstate
>>
>
> My host processor is non-throttable
> Uni-processor.
>
> I tried with some kernels (hey, vmware had serial ports?)
> For whatever reason, the timecounting is not accurate.
> As you can see, the time difference between "WP bit" and the calibration
> thing is less than half a second inside the guest, but on the host,
> the delay is several seconds.
> The Capture Movie feature gets it right
> http://jengelh.hopto.org/f/2618delay.avi
>
I see a large delay _before_:
Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. (lpj==
The lpj value is 38x the host lpj host value. Booting with lpj="some
random number" removes the stall for me. And finally, breaking into
kernel in this stall period consistently shows EIPs in calibrate_delay
in backtrace.
> One can see that it pauses before calibration (already mentioned that)
> and once again after NET: ... during IP init!? What's going on :(
>
The NET: pause has always been there, I think it just becomes much more
noticeable if the lpj value is 38x normal.
Conclusion: you are getting bad lpj computation during beginning.
Doesn't appear to be a kernel bug, so let's take it off list. You can
bring it up on VMTN
http://www.vmware.com/community/index.jspa?categoryID=1 for more
on-topic support. In fact, interesting test you can try - suspend /
resume during the hang. Does the discontinuity during calibration make
it go away?
Zach
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-01 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-29 9:55 2.6.18 is problematic in VMware Jan Engelhardt
2006-10-30 17:50 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-10-31 7:59 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-10-31 14:06 ` Mark Lord
2006-10-31 17:20 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-11-01 2:33 ` Zachary Amsden [this message]
2006-11-03 8:07 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-11-02 8:21 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2006-11-02 8:13 ` S.Çağlar Onur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45480777.6070908@vmware.com \
--to=zach@vmware.com \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox