public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dio: lock refcount operations
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:51:20 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45494F18.4000406@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49odrxnyyt.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>


> zach.brown> that path before the recent dio completion patch set.  We
> zach.brown> shouldn't expect significant performance regression from
> zach.brown> returning to the behaviour that existed before the completion
> zach.brown> clean up work. 
> 
> Are you going to quantify this at all?  I think we should.

I spotted some free time on an old dual athlon and got an initial look
at the cpu cost of the dio cleanup patches currently in -mm.

I ran two aio-stress instances doing O_DIRECT 64k sequential reads and
writes to an existing 1gig file on ext3 on an old pata drive.  I ran a
pair of cycle soakers measuring cpu load every second.  After trimming
out the 8 highest and lowest samples the remaining samples were
averaged.  I did this three times against 2.6.19-rc4-mm1 before and
after applying the dio-* patches.

before: 5.02% 5.23% 5.27%
after:  5.27% 5.33% 5.32%

So I'm not *gravely* concerned that we've regressed, but it'd be nice to
measure the impact of the dio-* patches on more capable hardware.

- z

      parent reply	other threads:[~2006-11-02  1:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-27 18:17 [PATCH] dio: lock refcount operations Zach Brown
2006-10-27 19:27 ` Jeff Moyer
2006-10-27 20:34   ` Zach Brown
2006-10-27 23:03     ` Jeff Moyer
2006-10-27 23:34       ` Zach Brown
2006-11-02  1:51       ` Zach Brown [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45494F18.4000406@oracle.com \
    --to=zach.brown@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox