From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752848AbWKCAJn (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Nov 2006 19:09:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752850AbWKCAJn (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Nov 2006 19:09:43 -0500 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:47825 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752848AbWKCAJm (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Nov 2006 19:09:42 -0500 Message-ID: <454A88C3.1060608@garzik.org> Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 19:09:39 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061027) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Rothwell CC: LKML Subject: Re: Dumb question for today References: <20061103104818.f280a003.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20061103104818.f280a003.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.7 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.3 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Does vmalloc() zero the memory it allocates? Nope. Jeff