From: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
To: menage@google.com
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, pj@sgi.com, sekharan@us.ibm.com,
ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, jlan@sgi.com,
Simon.Derr@bull.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mbligh@google.com, winget@google.com, rohitseth@google.com
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 2/6] Cpusets hooked into containers
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 12:04:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <454ED769.8040302@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061020190626.810567000@menage.corp.google.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 606 bytes --]
menage@google.com wrote:
> This patch removes the process grouping code from the cpusets code,
> instead hooking it into the generic container system. This temporarily
> adds cpuset-specific code in kernel/container.c, which is removed by
> the next patch in the series.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
I needed the following patches to get the cpuset code to compile.
Inlining two patches makes it hard to distinguish between the patches
and harder to read them, so I am attaching them along with this email.
--
Regards,
Balbir Singh,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM Software Labs
[-- Attachment #2: fix-cpuset-guarantee-online-cpus-mems-in-subtree.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 940 bytes --]
Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
---
kernel/cpuset.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN kernel/cpuset.c~fix-cpuset-guarantee-online-cpus-mems-in-subtree kernel/cpuset.c
--- linux-2.6.19-rc2/kernel/cpuset.c~fix-cpuset-guarantee-online-cpus-mems-in-subtree 2006-11-06 11:41:25.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc2-balbir/kernel/cpuset.c 2006-11-06 11:43:12.000000000 +0530
@@ -1280,10 +1280,12 @@ int __init cpuset_init(void)
static void guarantee_online_cpus_mems_in_subtree(const struct cpuset *cur)
{
+ struct container *cont;
struct cpuset *c;
/* Each of our child cpusets mems must be online */
- list_for_each_entry(c, &cur->children, sibling) {
+ list_for_each_entry(cont, &cur->container->children, sibling) {
+ c = container_cs(cont);
guarantee_online_cpus_mems_in_subtree(c);
if (!cpus_empty(c->cpus_allowed))
guarantee_online_cpus(c, &c->cpus_allowed);
_
[-- Attachment #3: fix-cpuset-proc-operations.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1225 bytes --]
Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
---
fs/proc/base.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/proc/base.c~fix-cpuset-proc-operations fs/proc/base.c
--- linux-2.6.19-rc2/fs/proc/base.c~fix-cpuset-proc-operations 2006-11-06 11:47:35.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc2-balbir/fs/proc/base.c 2006-11-06 11:48:27.000000000 +0530
@@ -68,7 +68,6 @@
#include <linux/security.h>
#include <linux/ptrace.h>
#include <linux/seccomp.h>
-#include <linux/cpuset.h>
#include <linux/container.h>
#include <linux/audit.h>
#include <linux/poll.h>
@@ -1788,9 +1787,6 @@ static struct pid_entry tgid_base_stuff[
#ifdef CONFIG_CONTAINERS
REG("container", S_IRUGO, container),
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPUSETS
- REG("cpuset", S_IRUGO, cpuset),
-#endif
INF("oom_score", S_IRUGO, oom_score),
REG("oom_adj", S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR, oom_adjust),
#ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
@@ -2065,9 +2061,6 @@ static struct pid_entry tid_base_stuff[]
#ifdef CONFIG_CONTAINERS
REG("container", S_IRUGO, container),
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPUSETS
- REG("cpuset", S_IRUGO, cpuset),
-#endif
INF("oom_score", S_IRUGO, oom_score),
REG("oom_adj", S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR, oom_adjust),
#ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-06 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-20 18:38 [PATCH 0/6] Generic Process Containers menage
2006-10-20 18:38 ` [PATCH 1/6] Generic container system abstracted from cpusets code menage
2006-10-20 18:38 ` [PATCH 2/6] Cpusets hooked into containers menage
2006-11-06 6:34 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2006-11-06 20:55 ` [ckrm-tech] " Paul Menage
2006-11-06 21:09 ` Paul Jackson
2006-11-06 21:22 ` Paul Menage
2006-11-07 14:06 ` Balbir Singh
2006-10-20 18:38 ` [PATCH 3/6] Add generic multi-subsystem API to containers menage
2006-10-20 18:38 ` [PATCH 4/6] Simple CPU accounting container subsystem menage
2006-10-20 18:38 ` [PATCH 5/6] Extension to container system to allow fork/exit callbacks menage
2006-10-20 18:38 ` [PATCH 6/6] Resource Groups over generic containers menage
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=454ED769.8040302@in.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=Simon.Derr@bull.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jlan@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rohitseth@google.com \
--cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=winget@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox