From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: [RFC/PATCH] - revert generic_fillattr stat->blksize to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:50:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <454FAE0A.3070409@redhat.com> (raw)
The inode diet patches first did this to generic_fillattr():
- stat->blksize = inode->i_blksize;
+ stat->blksize = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE;
but by 2.6.19-rc3 this was changed again:
- stat->blksize = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE;
+ stat->blksize = (1 << inode->i_blkbits);
I can't find for sure why this was done; perhaps because it exposed a bug
in cifs[1]
However, if we are going to pick a default for generic_fillattr, it should probably
be what most filesystems were using before, and let filesystems which need something
else re-set it to according to their needs. As it stands today, doing readdirs and
the like in block-sized chunks rather than page sized will probably not be the
best thing for performance.
A bit of quick parsing of the original inode diet patch shows that by far most
filesystems were using the page size:
(count) (line which sets i_blksize)
1 cifs_inode->vfs_inode.i_blksize = CIFS_MAX_MSGSIZE;
1 i->i_blksize = 512;
1 inode->i_blksize = attr->va_blocksize;
1 inode->i_blksize = befs_sb->block_size;
1 inode->i_blksize = HFSPLUS_SB(inode->i_sb).alloc_blksz;
1 inode->i_blksize = HFSPLUS_SB(sb).alloc_blksz;
1 inode->i_blksize = HFS_SB(inode->i_sb)->alloc_blksz;
1 inode->i_blksize = HFS_SB(sb)->alloc_blksz;
1 inode->i_blksize = HPAGE_SIZE;
1 inode->i_blksize = NCP_BLOCK_SIZE;
1 inode->i_blksize = QNX4_DIR_ENTRY_SIZE;
1 inode->i_blksize = (u32)osb->s_clustersize;
1 inode->i_blksize = xfs_preferred_iosize(mp);
1 ino->i_blksize = i_blksize;
1 ino->i_blksize = proc_ino->i_blksize;
1 ip->i_blksize = ip->i_sb->s_blocksize;
1 ip->i_blksize = PAGE_SIZE;
2 inode->i_blksize = fattr->du.nfs2.blocksize;
2 inode->i_blksize = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize;
2 inode->i_blksize = reiserfs_default_io_size;
2 inode->i_blksize = sbi->cluster_size;
2 vi->i_blksize = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE;
3 inode->i_blksize = sb->s_blocksize;
3 ret->i_blksize = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE;
5 inode->i_blksize = 1024;
7 inode->i_blksize = 0;
12 inode->i_blksize = PAGE_SIZE;
22 inode->i_blksize = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE;
so I would propose the following patch to make PAGE_CACHE_SIZE the default (again),
and let filesystems which need something -else- do that on their own.
[1] http://lists.samba.org/archive/linux-cifs-client/2006-September/001481.html
Thanks,
-Eric
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
--- linux.orig/fs/stat.c 2006-11-05 23:27:04.962482569 -0600
+++ linux/fs/stat.c 2006-11-05 23:27:29.394396050 -0600
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
stat->ctime = inode->i_ctime;
stat->size = i_size_read(inode);
stat->blocks = inode->i_blocks;
- stat->blksize = (1 << inode->i_blkbits);
+ stat->blksize = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_fillattr);
next reply other threads:[~2006-11-06 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-06 21:50 Eric Sandeen [this message]
2006-11-06 22:27 ` [RFC/PATCH] - revert generic_fillattr stat->blksize to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE Dave Kleikamp
2006-11-06 22:37 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-07 0:26 ` Steve French
2006-11-07 13:40 ` Dave Kleikamp
2006-11-07 15:34 ` Dave Kleikamp
2006-11-07 15:50 ` Steve French
2006-11-06 23:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-06 23:15 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-06 23:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-06 23:28 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-07 0:08 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-11-07 0:13 ` Hua Zhong
2006-11-07 1:39 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-07 3:43 ` Theodore Tso
2006-11-07 4:02 ` Eric Sandeen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-12-03 13:21 col-pepper
2006-12-03 13:48 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=454FAE0A.3070409@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox