From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com>
To: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@firmix.at>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Faustian Pact between Novell and Microsoft
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 15:12:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <455104C9.4040901@wolfmountaingroup.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1162937650.3408.2.camel@gimli.at.home>
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
>On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 09:54 -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>
>
>>Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 09:18 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>This is a watershed moment for Linux. It fundamentally changes the
>>>>rules of the game. We're really excited about this deal, and we hope
>>>>you are too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>(from http://www.novell.com/linux/microsoft/openletter.html) only make
>>>>it worse, but acquisition? I'd hope not even mickey$oft has enough
>>>>cash for _that_.
>>>>
>>>>
>[...]
>
>
>>>And the first point in the list is "patents" ....
>>>
>>>
>[...]
>
>
>>I can see the lights are coming on now for some folks now.
>>
>>
>
>How many patenst does Novell have? Do they play in the "more than 1000
>trivial, prior art and software patents" league like M$?
>So from Novell's point of view it is probably somewhat a cross-licensing
>deal.
>"What does M$ really gain from it?" is the interesting question.
>
> Bernd
>
>
The Pike patent from the USL acquisition is the one Microsoft most
wanted to get their hands on, as well as the SMP
patents. The Pike patent controls overlapping Windows. M$ has
wanted to get clear of it for some time. With the
cross license from Novell, they are home free. Novell has a large
number of networking and directory patents.
Not quite 1000, but they have some very good ones on SMP, clustering,
and form the USL acquisition.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-07 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-02 23:14 Faustian Pact between Novell and Microsoft Jeff V. Merkey
2006-11-02 23:41 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-02 23:45 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-11-03 1:49 ` Petr Baudis
2006-11-03 3:16 ` Jeffrey V. Merkey
2006-11-03 22:46 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-11-04 22:56 ` Eduard Giménez
2006-11-07 8:18 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-07 10:17 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-11-07 16:54 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-11-07 17:47 ` Gene Heskett
2006-11-07 20:14 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-11-07 20:37 ` Gene Heskett
2006-11-07 21:57 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-08 4:57 ` David Schwartz
2006-11-08 5:11 ` Avuton Olrich
2006-11-08 8:56 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-11-08 9:53 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-11-07 22:14 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-11-07 22:12 ` Jeff V. Merkey [this message]
2006-11-03 11:40 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2006-11-03 14:39 ` Gene Heskett
2006-11-03 16:53 ` Jeffrey V. Merkey
2006-11-04 18:33 ` Gene Heskett
2006-11-08 14:10 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-11-08 19:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-08 22:13 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=455104C9.4040901@wolfmountaingroup.com \
--to=jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com \
--cc=bernd@firmix.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasky@suse.cz \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox