public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Henne Vogelsang <hvogel@suse.de>,
	Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
Subject: Re: util-linux: orphan
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:45:34 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4553AF8E.60605@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061109224157.GH4324@petra.dvoda.cz>

Karel Zak wrote:
> 
>  I've originally thought about util-linux upstream fork, but as
>  usually an fork is bad step. So.. I'd like to start some discussion
>  before this step. Maybe Adrian will be realistic and he will leave
>  the project and invest all his time to kernel only.
> 

Actually, forking is not really that bad of an idea.  When I took over 
tftp, for example, I just did it and called it tftp-hpa.  It didn't take 
very long before I got a message from the netkit maintainer asking if I 
was planning to continue, and if so if he could drop tftp from netkit.

A similar thing happened when Jeremy (and now Ian) took over autofs from me.

Forking gets your new maintainership proven *before* you end up taking 
over.  On the other hand, magicfilter effectively died when I handed it 
over to someone who didn't do a good job with it.

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-09 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-18  7:52 [ANNOUNCE] util-linux-ng Karel Zak
2006-11-09 22:41 ` util-linux: orphan Karel Zak
2006-11-09 22:45   ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2006-11-10 10:02   ` Pádraig Brady
2006-12-18  7:17   ` Karel Zak
2006-12-18  9:33     ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-12-18 10:05       ` Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2006-12-18 10:49       ` Matthias Koenig
2006-12-18 15:00       ` Karel Zak
2006-12-27  2:46     ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-12-27  3:08       ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-12-27  3:58         ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-12-27  4:35         ` Theodore Tso
2006-12-27 11:24           ` Alessandro Suardi
2006-12-27 11:46             ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-12-27 13:18           ` Horst H. von Brand
2006-12-27 13:24         ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-12-27  4:17       ` Chris Adams
2006-12-27 18:15       ` Karel Zak
2006-12-27 18:39         ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-12-27 19:18           ` Karel Zak
2006-12-27 20:42             ` Theodore Tso
2006-12-27 22:12               ` Karel Zak
2006-12-27 22:21                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-12-30  7:31                 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-12-28 10:28               ` Ian Kent
2006-12-18  8:35 ` [ANNOUNCE] util-linux-ng Ian Kent
2006-12-18  8:50   ` Karel Zak
2006-12-18  9:55 ` Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2006-12-18 10:40   ` Ian Kent
2006-12-20 12:19     ` Jens Axboe
2006-12-20 14:55       ` Ian Kent
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-12-20  6:42 util-linux: orphan Albert Cahalan
2006-12-20 16:13 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-12-20 17:27   ` Albert Cahalan
2006-12-21 20:09     ` Jan Engelhardt
     [not found] <fa.LNsUrtZq/ifve7DpPe6aiVU8Usk@ifi.uio.no>

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4553AF8E.60605@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=hvogel@suse.de \
    --cc=kzak@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olh@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox