public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@sw.ru>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>,
	devel@openvz.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>, Jan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc3] VFS: per-sb dentry lru list
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:12:45 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45595E5D.5040309@sw.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17753.22478.650633.368773@cse.unsw.edu.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2380 bytes --]

Hello Neil

Neil Brown wrote:
> On Wednesday November 1, vvs@sw.ru wrote:
>> Currently we have 3 type of functions that works with dentry_unused list:
>>
>> 1) prune_dcache(NULL) -- called from shrink_dcache_memory, frees the memory and
>> requires global LRU. works well in current implementation.
>> 2) prune_dcache(sb)  -- called from shrink_dcache_parent(), frees subtree, LRU
>> is not need here.  Current implementation uses global LRU for these purposes, it
>> is ineffective, and patch from Neil Brown fixes this issue.
>> 3) shrink_dcache_sb() -- called when we need to free the unused dentries for
>> given super block. Current implementation is not effective too, and per-sb LRU
>> would be the best solution here. On the other hand patch from Neil Brown is much
>> better than current implementation.
>>
>> In general I think that we should approve Neil Brown's patch. We (I and Kirill
>> Korotaev) are ready to acknowledge it when the following remarks fill be fixed:
> 
> 
>> - it seems for me list_splice() is not required inside
>>   prune_dcache(),
> 
> Yes, the list should be empty when we finish so you are right.
> 
>> - DCACHE_REFERENCED dentries should not be removed from private list to
>> dentry_unused list, this flag should be ignored if the private list is used,
> 
> Agreed.
> 
>> - count argument should be ignored in this case too, we want to free all the
>> dentries in private list,
> 
> Agreed.
> 
>> - when we shrink the whole super block we should free per-sb anonymous dentries
>> too (please see Kirill Korotaev's letter)
>>
> 
> Yes.  Unfortunately I don't think it is as easy as it sounds.
> I'll have a closer look.
> 
> 
>> Then I'm going to prepare new patch that will enhance the shrink_dcache_sb()
>> performance:
>> - we can add new list head into struct superblock and use it in
>> shrink_dcache_sb() instead of temporal private list. We will check is it empty
>> in dput() and add the new unused dentries to per-sb list instead of
>> dentry_unused list.
> 
> I think that makes sense.  It means that you end up doing less work in
> select_parent, because the work has already been done in dput.
> 
> How is the patch going?

Please see patches in attach files:
first one is incremental for your patch,
second one is merged version.

It would be very interesting to know your opinion about these changes.

thank you,
	Vasily Averin

[-- Attachment #2: diff-vfs-shrink-dcache-NBaddon-20061103 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 6385 bytes --]

--- linux-2.6.19-rc4/fs/dcache.c.vshud1	2006-11-02 14:23:03.000000000 +0300
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc4/fs/dcache.c	2006-11-03 14:57:58.000000000 +0300
@@ -171,8 +171,14 @@ repeat:
  	if (d_unhashed(dentry))
 		goto kill_it;
   	if (list_empty(&dentry->d_lru)) {
-  		dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_REFERENCED;
-  		list_add(&dentry->d_lru, &dentry_unused);
+		struct list_head *list;
+		
+		list = &dentry->d_sb->s_shrink_list;
+		if (list_empty(list)) {
+			list = &dentry_unused;
+  			dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_REFERENCED;
+		}
+  		list_add(&dentry->d_lru, list);
   		dentry_stat.nr_unused++;
   	}
  	spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
@@ -394,10 +400,6 @@ static void prune_one_dentry(struct dent
  *
  * This function may fail to free any resources if
  * all the dentries are in use.
- *
- * Any dentries that were not removed due to the @count
- * limit will be splice on to the end of dentry_unused,
- * so they should already be founded in dentry_stat.nr_unused.
  */
  
 static void prune_dcache(int count, struct list_head *list)
@@ -409,7 +411,7 @@ static void prune_dcache(int count, stru
 		/* use the dentry_unused list */
 		list = &dentry_unused;
 
-	for (; count ; count--) {
+	for (; have_list || count-- ;) {
 		struct dentry *dentry;
 		struct list_head *tmp;
 		struct rw_semaphore *s_umount;
@@ -434,6 +436,17 @@ static void prune_dcache(int count, stru
  			spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
 			continue;
 		}
+		/*
+		 * If this dentry is for "my" filesystem, then I can prune it
+		 * without taking the s_umount lock: either I already hold it
+		 * (called from shrink_dcache_sb) or are called from some
+		 * filesystem opernations and therefore cannot race with 
+		 * generic_shutdown_super().
+		 */
+		if (have_list) {
+			prune_one_dentry(dentry);
+			continue;
+		}
 		/* If the dentry was recently referenced, don't free it. */
 		if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_REFERENCED) {
 			dentry->d_flags &= ~DCACHE_REFERENCED;
@@ -443,21 +456,6 @@ static void prune_dcache(int count, stru
 			continue;
 		}
 		/*
-		 * If the dentry is not DCACHED_REFERENCED, it is time
-		 * to remove it from the dcache, provided the super block is
-		 * NULL (which means we are trying to reclaim memory)
-		 * or this dentry belongs to the same super block that
-		 * we want to shrink.
-		 */
-		/*
-		 * If this dentry is for "my" filesystem, then I can prune it
-		 * without taking the s_umount lock (I already hold it).
-		 */
-		if (have_list) {
-			prune_one_dentry(dentry);
-			continue;
-		}
-		/*
 		 * ...otherwise we need to be sure this filesystem isn't being
 		 * unmounted, otherwise we could race with
 		 * generic_shutdown_super(), and end up holding a reference to
@@ -483,27 +481,9 @@ static void prune_dcache(int count, stru
  		list_add(&dentry->d_lru, &dentry_unused);
 		dentry_stat.nr_unused++;
 	}
-	/* split any remaining entries back onto dentry_unused */
-	if (have_list)
-		list_splice(list, dentry_unused.prev);
 	spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
 }
 
-/**
- * shrink_dcache_sb - shrink dcache for a superblock
- * @sb: superblock
- *
- * Shrink the dcache for the specified super block. This
- * is used to reduce the dcache presence of a file system
- * before re-mounting, and when invalidating the device
- * holding a file system.
- */
-
-void shrink_dcache_sb(struct super_block * sb)
-{
-	shrink_dcache_parent(sb->s_root);
-}
-
 /*
  * destroy a single subtree of dentries for unmount
  * - see the comments on shrink_dcache_for_umount() for a description of the
@@ -706,11 +686,10 @@ positive:
  * drop the lock and return early due to latency
  * constraints.
  */
-static int select_parent(struct dentry * parent, struct list_head *new)
+static void select_parent(struct dentry * parent, struct list_head *new)
 {
 	struct dentry *this_parent = parent;
 	struct list_head *next;
-	int found = 0;
 
 	spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
 repeat:
@@ -732,7 +711,6 @@ resume:
 		if (!atomic_read(&dentry->d_count)) {
 			list_add_tail(&dentry->d_lru, new);
 			dentry_stat.nr_unused++;
-			found++;
 		}
 
 		/*
@@ -740,7 +718,7 @@ resume:
 		 * ensures forward progress). We'll be coming back to find
 		 * the rest.
 		 */
-		if (found && need_resched())
+		if (!list_empty(new) && need_resched())
 			goto out;
 
 		/*
@@ -761,7 +739,37 @@ resume:
 	}
 out:
 	spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
-	return found;
+}
+
+/**
+ * select_anon - further prune the cache
+ * @sb: superblock
+ *
+ * Prune the dentries that are anonymous
+ */
+
+static void select_anon(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+	struct hlist_node *lp;
+	struct hlist_head *head = &sb->s_anon;
+
+	spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
+	hlist_for_each(lp, head) {
+		struct dentry *this = hlist_entry(lp, struct dentry, d_hash);
+		if (!list_empty(&this->d_lru)) {
+			dentry_stat.nr_unused--;
+			list_del_init(&this->d_lru);
+		}
+		/*
+		 * move only zero ref count dentries to the end 
+		 * of list for prune_dcache
+		 */
+		if (!atomic_read(&this->d_count)) {
+			list_add(&this->d_lru, &sb->s_shrink_list);
+			dentry_stat.nr_unused++;
+		}
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -773,11 +781,38 @@ out:
  
 void shrink_dcache_parent(struct dentry * parent)
 {
-	int found;
 	LIST_HEAD(list);
 
-	while ((found = select_parent(parent, &list)) != 0)
-		prune_dcache(found, &list);
+	for (;;) {
+		select_parent(parent, &list);
+		if (list_empty(&list))
+			break;
+		prune_dcache(0, &list);
+	}
+}
+
+/**
+ * shrink_dcache_sb - shrink dcache for a superblock
+ * @sb: superblock
+ *
+ * Shrink the dcache for the specified super block. This
+ * is used to reduce the dcache presence of a file system
+ * before re-mounting, and when invalidating the device
+ * holding a file system.
+ */
+
+void shrink_dcache_sb(struct super_block * sb)
+{
+	struct list_head *list;
+		
+	list = &sb->s_shrink_list;
+	for (;;) {
+		select_parent(sb->s_root, list);
+		select_anon(sb);
+		if (list_empty(list))
+			break;
+		prune_dcache(0, list);
+	}
 }
 
 /*
--- linux-2.6.19-rc4/include/linux/fs.h.vshud1	2006-11-03 15:28:04.000000000 +0300
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc4/include/linux/fs.h	2006-11-03 14:52:16.000000000 +0300
@@ -941,6 +941,7 @@ struct super_block {
 	struct hlist_head	s_anon;		/* anonymous dentries for (nfs) exporting */
 	struct list_head	s_files;
 
+	struct list_head	s_shrink_list;
 	struct block_device	*s_bdev;
 	struct list_head	s_instances;
 	struct quota_info	s_dquot;	/* Diskquota specific options */

[-- Attachment #3: diff-vfs-shrink-dcache-20061103 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 8824 bytes --]

--- linux-2.6.19-rc4/fs/dcache.c.vdch	2006-11-03 14:22:54.000000000 +0300
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc4/fs/dcache.c	2006-11-03 14:57:58.000000000 +0300
@@ -171,8 +171,14 @@ repeat:
  	if (d_unhashed(dentry))
 		goto kill_it;
   	if (list_empty(&dentry->d_lru)) {
-  		dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_REFERENCED;
-  		list_add(&dentry->d_lru, &dentry_unused);
+		struct list_head *list;
+		
+		list = &dentry->d_sb->s_shrink_list;
+		if (list_empty(list)) {
+			list = &dentry_unused;
+  			dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_REFERENCED;
+		}
+  		list_add(&dentry->d_lru, list);
   		dentry_stat.nr_unused++;
   	}
  	spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
@@ -384,8 +390,8 @@ static void prune_one_dentry(struct dent
 /**
  * prune_dcache - shrink the dcache
  * @count: number of entries to try and free
- * @sb: if given, ignore dentries for other superblocks
- *         which are being unmounted.
+ * @list: If given, remove from this list instead of
+ *        from dentry_unused.
  *
  * Shrink the dcache. This is done when we need
  * more memory, or simply when we need to unmount
@@ -396,33 +402,27 @@ static void prune_one_dentry(struct dent
  * all the dentries are in use.
  */
  
-static void prune_dcache(int count, struct super_block *sb)
+static void prune_dcache(int count, struct list_head *list)
 {
+	int have_list = list != NULL;
+
 	spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
-	for (; count ; count--) {
+	if (!have_list)
+		/* use the dentry_unused list */
+		list = &dentry_unused;
+
+	for (; have_list || count-- ;) {
 		struct dentry *dentry;
 		struct list_head *tmp;
 		struct rw_semaphore *s_umount;
 
 		cond_resched_lock(&dcache_lock);
 
-		tmp = dentry_unused.prev;
-		if (sb) {
-			/* Try to find a dentry for this sb, but don't try
-			 * too hard, if they aren't near the tail they will
-			 * be moved down again soon
-			 */
-			int skip = count;
-			while (skip && tmp != &dentry_unused &&
-			    list_entry(tmp, struct dentry, d_lru)->d_sb != sb) {
-				skip--;
-				tmp = tmp->prev;
-			}
-		}
-		if (tmp == &dentry_unused)
+		tmp = list->prev;
+		if (tmp == list)
 			break;
 		list_del_init(tmp);
-		prefetch(dentry_unused.prev);
+		prefetch(list->prev);
  		dentry_stat.nr_unused--;
 		dentry = list_entry(tmp, struct dentry, d_lru);
 
@@ -436,6 +436,17 @@ static void prune_dcache(int count, stru
  			spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
 			continue;
 		}
+		/*
+		 * If this dentry is for "my" filesystem, then I can prune it
+		 * without taking the s_umount lock: either I already hold it
+		 * (called from shrink_dcache_sb) or are called from some
+		 * filesystem opernations and therefore cannot race with 
+		 * generic_shutdown_super().
+		 */
+		if (have_list) {
+			prune_one_dentry(dentry);
+			continue;
+		}
 		/* If the dentry was recently referenced, don't free it. */
 		if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_REFERENCED) {
 			dentry->d_flags &= ~DCACHE_REFERENCED;
@@ -445,21 +456,6 @@ static void prune_dcache(int count, stru
 			continue;
 		}
 		/*
-		 * If the dentry is not DCACHED_REFERENCED, it is time
-		 * to remove it from the dcache, provided the super block is
-		 * NULL (which means we are trying to reclaim memory)
-		 * or this dentry belongs to the same super block that
-		 * we want to shrink.
-		 */
-		/*
-		 * If this dentry is for "my" filesystem, then I can prune it
-		 * without taking the s_umount lock (I already hold it).
-		 */
-		if (sb && dentry->d_sb == sb) {
-			prune_one_dentry(dentry);
-			continue;
-		}
-		/*
 		 * ...otherwise we need to be sure this filesystem isn't being
 		 * unmounted, otherwise we could race with
 		 * generic_shutdown_super(), and end up holding a reference to
@@ -489,67 +485,6 @@ static void prune_dcache(int count, stru
 }
 
 /*
- * Shrink the dcache for the specified super block.
- * This allows us to unmount a device without disturbing
- * the dcache for the other devices.
- *
- * This implementation makes just two traversals of the
- * unused list.  On the first pass we move the selected
- * dentries to the most recent end, and on the second
- * pass we free them.  The second pass must restart after
- * each dput(), but since the target dentries are all at
- * the end, it's really just a single traversal.
- */
-
-/**
- * shrink_dcache_sb - shrink dcache for a superblock
- * @sb: superblock
- *
- * Shrink the dcache for the specified super block. This
- * is used to free the dcache before unmounting a file
- * system
- */
-
-void shrink_dcache_sb(struct super_block * sb)
-{
-	struct list_head *tmp, *next;
-	struct dentry *dentry;
-
-	/*
-	 * Pass one ... move the dentries for the specified
-	 * superblock to the most recent end of the unused list.
-	 */
-	spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
-	list_for_each_safe(tmp, next, &dentry_unused) {
-		dentry = list_entry(tmp, struct dentry, d_lru);
-		if (dentry->d_sb != sb)
-			continue;
-		list_move(tmp, &dentry_unused);
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Pass two ... free the dentries for this superblock.
-	 */
-repeat:
-	list_for_each_safe(tmp, next, &dentry_unused) {
-		dentry = list_entry(tmp, struct dentry, d_lru);
-		if (dentry->d_sb != sb)
-			continue;
-		dentry_stat.nr_unused--;
-		list_del_init(tmp);
-		spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
-		if (atomic_read(&dentry->d_count)) {
-			spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
-			continue;
-		}
-		prune_one_dentry(dentry);
-		cond_resched_lock(&dcache_lock);
-		goto repeat;
-	}
-	spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
-}
-
-/*
  * destroy a single subtree of dentries for unmount
  * - see the comments on shrink_dcache_for_umount() for a description of the
  *   locking
@@ -739,7 +674,7 @@ positive:
 
 /*
  * Search the dentry child list for the specified parent,
- * and move any unused dentries to the end of the unused
+ * and move any unused dentries to the end of a new unused
  * list for prune_dcache(). We descend to the next level
  * whenever the d_subdirs list is non-empty and continue
  * searching.
@@ -751,11 +686,10 @@ positive:
  * drop the lock and return early due to latency
  * constraints.
  */
-static int select_parent(struct dentry * parent)
+static void select_parent(struct dentry * parent, struct list_head *new)
 {
 	struct dentry *this_parent = parent;
 	struct list_head *next;
-	int found = 0;
 
 	spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
 repeat:
@@ -775,9 +709,8 @@ resume:
 		 * of the unused list for prune_dcache
 		 */
 		if (!atomic_read(&dentry->d_count)) {
-			list_add_tail(&dentry->d_lru, &dentry_unused);
+			list_add_tail(&dentry->d_lru, new);
 			dentry_stat.nr_unused++;
-			found++;
 		}
 
 		/*
@@ -785,7 +718,7 @@ resume:
 		 * ensures forward progress). We'll be coming back to find
 		 * the rest.
 		 */
-		if (found && need_resched())
+		if (!list_empty(new) && need_resched())
 			goto out;
 
 		/*
@@ -806,7 +739,37 @@ resume:
 	}
 out:
 	spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
-	return found;
+}
+
+/**
+ * select_anon - further prune the cache
+ * @sb: superblock
+ *
+ * Prune the dentries that are anonymous
+ */
+
+static void select_anon(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+	struct hlist_node *lp;
+	struct hlist_head *head = &sb->s_anon;
+
+	spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
+	hlist_for_each(lp, head) {
+		struct dentry *this = hlist_entry(lp, struct dentry, d_hash);
+		if (!list_empty(&this->d_lru)) {
+			dentry_stat.nr_unused--;
+			list_del_init(&this->d_lru);
+		}
+		/*
+		 * move only zero ref count dentries to the end 
+		 * of list for prune_dcache
+		 */
+		if (!atomic_read(&this->d_count)) {
+			list_add(&this->d_lru, &sb->s_shrink_list);
+			dentry_stat.nr_unused++;
+		}
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -818,10 +781,38 @@ out:
  
 void shrink_dcache_parent(struct dentry * parent)
 {
-	int found;
+	LIST_HEAD(list);
 
-	while ((found = select_parent(parent)) != 0)
-		prune_dcache(found, parent->d_sb);
+	for (;;) {
+		select_parent(parent, &list);
+		if (list_empty(&list))
+			break;
+		prune_dcache(0, &list);
+	}
+}
+
+/**
+ * shrink_dcache_sb - shrink dcache for a superblock
+ * @sb: superblock
+ *
+ * Shrink the dcache for the specified super block. This
+ * is used to reduce the dcache presence of a file system
+ * before re-mounting, and when invalidating the device
+ * holding a file system.
+ */
+
+void shrink_dcache_sb(struct super_block * sb)
+{
+	struct list_head *list;
+		
+	list = &sb->s_shrink_list;
+	for (;;) {
+		select_parent(sb->s_root, list);
+		select_anon(sb);
+		if (list_empty(list))
+			break;
+		prune_dcache(0, list);
+	}
 }
 
 /*
--- linux-2.6.19-rc4/include/linux/fs.h.vdch	2006-11-03 14:22:12.000000000 +0300
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc4/include/linux/fs.h	2006-11-03 14:52:16.000000000 +0300
@@ -941,6 +941,7 @@ struct super_block {
 	struct hlist_head	s_anon;		/* anonymous dentries for (nfs) exporting */
 	struct list_head	s_files;
 
+	struct list_head	s_shrink_list;
 	struct block_device	*s_bdev;
 	struct list_head	s_instances;
 	struct quota_info	s_dquot;	/* Diskquota specific options */

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-14  6:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-25 12:30 [Q] missing unused dentry in prune_dcache()? Vasily Averin
2006-10-25 13:51 ` David Howells
2006-10-25 13:58   ` Vasily Averin
2006-10-25 14:23     ` David Howells
2006-10-26 11:36       ` Vasily Averin
2006-10-26 13:25         ` David Howells
2006-10-27  8:05           ` Vasily Averin
2006-10-27 10:42             ` David Howells
2006-10-27 11:50               ` Vasily Averin
2006-10-27 12:11                 ` David Howells
2006-10-27 13:47                   ` Vasily Averin
2006-10-27 14:29                     ` David Howells
2006-10-27 14:39                       ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-10-27 14:05                   ` [PATCH 2.6.19-rc3] VFS: per-sb dentry lru list Vasily Averin
2006-10-27 18:06                     ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-30 14:24                       ` Vasily Averin
2006-10-30 15:08                         ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-30 15:34                           ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-10-30 16:09                             ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-30 15:14                       ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-10-30  4:24                     ` David Chinner
2006-10-30  6:28                       ` [Devel] " Kirill Korotaev
2006-10-31  4:38                         ` Neil Brown
2006-10-31 10:40                           ` David Howells
2006-11-01  6:32                             ` Neil Brown
2006-11-01 13:32                               ` Vasily Averin
2006-11-14  5:44                                 ` Neil Brown
2006-11-14  6:12                                   ` Vasily Averin [this message]
2006-10-31 13:08                           ` Vasily Averin
2006-11-01 10:55                           ` [Devel] " Kirill Korotaev
2006-11-14  4:51                             ` Neil Brown
2006-11-14  9:29                               ` David Howells
2006-10-27 13:42       ` [PATCH 2.6.19-rc3] VFS: missing unused dentry in prune_dcache() Vasily Averin
2006-10-27 14:24         ` David Howells
2006-10-26 11:49 ` [Q] missing unused dentry in prune_dcache()? Vasily Averin
2006-10-26 12:33   ` David Howells
2006-10-26 13:23   ` David Howells
2006-10-26 13:58     ` Vasily Averin
2006-10-26 14:07       ` David Howells
2006-10-27  6:32     ` Vasily Averin
2006-10-27  6:50       ` Vasily Averin
2006-10-27  9:36         ` David Howells
2006-10-31 13:24 ` [Q] missing ->d_delete() in shrink_dcache_for_umount()? Vasily Averin
2006-10-31 15:06   ` David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45595E5D.5040309@sw.ru \
    --to=vvs@sw.ru \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dev@openvz.org \
    --cc=dev@sw.ru \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jblunck@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=olh@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox