public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@linux.intel.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc5 nasty ACPI regression, AE_TIME errors
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 19:23:22 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <455C907A.8080600@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200611160803.04152.david-b@pacbell.net>

David Brownell wrote:
> On Thursday 16 November 2006 7:41 am, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>   
>> Looks like either EC GPE or whole ACPI irq got disabled... Could you 
>> check that ACPI interrupts still arrive after
>> you notice AE_TIME?
>>     
>
> If I unplug AC, /proc/interrrupts reports 2 IRQs going to ACPI.
> Then on replug, it reports 10-12 IRQs going to ACPI.
>   
What is the state of kacpid and kacpid_notify ?
>
>   
>> Also, may be attached patch will help?
>>     
>
> I'l give it a try next time I can reboot (presumably by this PM).
>
> - Dave
>
>
>   
>> Regards,
>>     Alex.
>>
>> David Brownell wrote:
>>     
>>> On Wednesday 15 November 2006 1:56 pm, David Brownell wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> On Wednesday 15 November 2006 6:48 am, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> ec1.patch
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Always enable GPE after return from notify handler.
>>>>>
>>>>> From:  Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Yes, this seems to resolve the regression as well as Len's ec_intr=0 boot param.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> Whoops, I spoke too soon.  It does get rid of SOME of the AE_TIME errors.  But
>>> the system is still confused about whether or not the AC is connected, and
>>> whether the battery is charging or not; and the CPU is still relatively hot.
>>> Even with this patch I later got:
>>>
>>> ACPI Exception (evregion-0424): AE_TIME, Returned by Handler for [EmbeddedControl] [20060707]
>>> ACPI Exception (dswexec-0458): AE_TIME, While resolving operands for [OpcodeName unavailable] [2006070
>>> 7]
>>> ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_TZ_.THRM._TMP] (Node ffff810002032d10), AE
>>> _TIME
>>>
>>> In short, better but evidently not yet good enough...
>>>
>>> - Dave
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> IMO this should get merged into 2.6.19 ASAP ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>>  drivers/acpi/ec.c |    2 --
>>>>>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
>>>>> index e6d4b08..937eafc 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
>>>>> @@ -465,8 +465,6 @@ static u32 acpi_ec_gpe_handler(void *dat
>>>>>  
>>>>>         if (value & ACPI_EC_FLAG_SCI) {
>>>>>                 status = acpi_os_execute(OSL_EC_BURST_HANDLER, acpi_ec_gpe_query, ec);
>>>>> -               return status == AE_OK ?
>>>>> -                   ACPI_INTERRUPT_HANDLED : ACPI_INTERRUPT_NOT_HANDLED;
>>>>>         }
>>>>>         acpi_enable_gpe(NULL, ec->gpe_bit, ACPI_ISR);
>>>>>         return status == AE_OK ?
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>     

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-16 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-15  7:03 2.6.19-rc5 nasty ACPI regression, AE_TIME errors David Brownell
2006-11-15  7:48 ` Len Brown
2006-11-15 14:48   ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-11-15 21:56     ` David Brownell
2006-11-16  1:10       ` David Brownell
2006-11-16 15:41         ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-11-16 16:03           ` David Brownell
2006-11-16 16:23             ` Alexey Starikovskiy [this message]
2006-11-16 16:53               ` David Brownell
2006-11-17  6:22           ` David Brownell
2006-11-17 21:04             ` David Brownell
2006-11-18 16:18               ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-11-15 18:46   ` David Brownell
2006-11-21 14:47   ` Janosch Machowinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=455C907A.8080600@linux.intel.com \
    --to=alexey.y.starikovskiy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox