From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Dan Williams <djbw@fb.com>, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/4] dma: add dmaengine driver for Samsung s3c24xx SoCs
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 00:02:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45625193.0y3McEvmiD@flatron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201305152348.32171.heiko@sntech.de>
On Wednesday 15 of May 2013 23:48:31 Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2013, 23:20:08 schrieb Sylwester Nawrocki:
> > On 05/15/2013 10:31 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > >>> + BUG();
> > >>>
> > >> > Isn't that a bit nasty. This macro should be used with care and
> > >> > we
> > >> > should recover if possible. dev_err()?
> > >
> > > runtime_config already denies any settings not in the 1,2 or 4bytes
> > > range - the default-part should therefore never be reached. So if
> > > any other value magically appears in the register and triggers the
> > > default-part, something is seriously wrong. So my guess is, the BUG
> > > might be appropriate.
> > >
> > > On the other hand the whole default+BUG part could also simply go
> > > away,
> > > for the same reasons.
> >
> > IMHO BUG() is not needed at all. As Linus suggested dev_err() is such
> > case or WARN_ON() would be more appropriate. This has been discussed
> > in the past extensively, not sure if you are aware of the other
> > Linus' opinion on BUG()/BUG_ON() proliferation:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/27/461
> Very interesting read and I'll keep this in mind in the future. What
> about the other option ... i.e. simply getting rid of the whole "error
> handling", as the other code paths should already make sure that only
> valid values get written into the register.
>
> Can the value change in the register somehow on its own without kernel
> intervention, or does this not happen?
Hmm, it depends on hardware, I guess. Not sure how it works on this
particular IP.
Still, the mentioned BUG() was about a value in a driver-filled struct,
wasn't it?
/* Quoting the the code for reference */
> +static u32 s3c24xx_dma_getbytes_chan(struct s3c24xx_dma_chan *s3cchan)
> +{
> + struct s3c24xx_dma_phy *phy = s3cchan->phy;
> + struct s3c24xx_txd *txd = s3cchan->at;
> + u32 tc = readl(phy->base + DSTAT) & DSTAT_CURRTC_MASK;
> +
> + switch (txd->dcon & DCON_DSZ_MASK) {
> + case DCON_DSZ_BYTE:
> + return tc;
> + case DCON_DSZ_HALFWORD:
> + return tc * 2;
> + case DCON_DSZ_WORD:
> + return tc * 4;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + BUG();
(Btw. I don't see anything setting the DCON_DSZ bits in this field. Am I
missing something?)
Best regards,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-15 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-11 11:30 [RFC 0/4] ARM: S3C24XX: add dmaengine based dma-driver Heiko Stübner
2013-05-11 11:30 ` [RFC 1/4] ARM: S3C24XX: number the dma clocks Heiko Stübner
2013-05-11 11:31 ` [RFC 2/4] dma: add dmaengine driver for Samsung s3c24xx SoCs Heiko Stübner
2013-05-14 12:47 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-14 13:51 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-05-15 18:38 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-14 14:21 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-05-15 18:53 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-15 20:31 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-05-15 21:20 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-05-15 21:48 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-05-15 22:02 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2013-05-15 22:45 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-05-15 23:26 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-05-17 12:20 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-11 11:32 ` [RFC 3/4] ARM: S3C24XX: add platform-devices for new dma driver for s3c2412 and s3c2443 Heiko Stübner
2013-05-11 11:32 ` [RFC 4/4] ARM: SAMSUNG: set s3c24xx_dma_filter for s3c64xx-spi0 device Heiko Stübner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-05-16 2:18 [RFC 2/4] dma: add dmaengine driver for Samsung s3c24xx SoCs Jingoo Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45625193.0y3McEvmiD@flatron \
--to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=djbw@fb.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox