From: Amin Azez <azez@ufomechanic.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux.nics@intel.com, Michael.ODonnell@stratus.com,
jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com
Subject: e100 breakage located
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:37:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45641A4E.6020505@ufomechanic.net> (raw)
I'm not subscribed to lkm so please Cc me in any responses.
This may be relevant to a post by jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com who
reported e100 as not working; perhaps if he uses a cross-over cable it
will "work" again.
I notice a patch in 2005 from Micahel O'Donnel to the e100.c driver has
stopped auto-crossover working on some e100 devices we use.
On one system the auto-negotiation was restored by commenting out:
(nic->mac == mac_82551_10) in function e100_phy_init where the MDI/MDI-X
is disabled.
lspci reports:
01:04.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100]
(rev 10)
01:04.0 Class 0200: 8086:1229 (rev 10)
and on another device
01:05.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82559ER (rev 10)
01:01.0 Class 0200: 8086:1209 (rev 10)
So it is true that we are revision 10, but 82557/9 not 82551.
I must confess that having gotten this far, I am lost. Of course I can
"fix" the driver for our hardware but I am not sure how to contrive a
general fix.
Maybe the actual damage is done in
e100_get_defaults(struct nic *nic)
where nic->mac is set to nic->rev_id ?
But it generally seems to be a failure to take into account the actual
hardware type, and only consider the revision.
Any ideas?
Sam
next reply other threads:[~2006-11-22 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-22 9:37 Amin Azez [this message]
2006-11-30 19:34 ` e100 breakage located Jesse Brandeburg
2006-12-09 9:17 ` Amin Azez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45641A4E.6020505@ufomechanic.net \
--to=azez@ufomechanic.net \
--cc=Michael.ODonnell@stratus.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux.nics@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox