Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework

Dmitry Mishin
2006-11-22T16:58:08Z

On Wednesday 22 November 2006 19:41, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Cedric Le Goater (clg@fr.ibm.com):
> > Hello,
> >
> > Dmitry Mishin wrote:
> >
> > > This patch looks acceptable for us.
> >
> > good. shall we merge it then ? see comment below.
> >
> > > BTW, Daniel, we agreed to be based on the Andrey's patchset. I do not see a
> > > reason, why Cedric force us to make some unnecessary work and move existent
> > > patchset over his interface.
> >
> > yeah it's a bit different from andrey's but not that much and it's more in
>
> Where is Andrey's patch?
This thread - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/42666

>
> > the spirit of uts and ipc namespace (and user namespace if that reaches the
> > kernel one day :) so that's why i made the small changes.
>
> I agree the namespace frameworks should be consistent, but i don't know
> whether Andrey's is or not. I'd like to have the framework included so
> we reduce the number of silly rewrites due to clone flag collisions etc.
>
> >
> > It also helping the nsproxy/namespace syscalls to have a similar interface
> > to manipulate namespaces. who knows, soon we might be able to have a 'struct
> > namespace' with a ops field to define new namespace types ?
> >
> > I can also send a empty framework for user namespace ;)
>
> Please do - then I'll rebase the patchset I sent to the containes list
> onto your patch, and resubmit the whole userns.
>
> -serge
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

--
Thanks,
Dmitry.