public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wink Saville <wink@saville.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: unify/rewrite SMP TSC sync code
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:56:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4567B0CC.4030802@saville.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061124202514.GA7608@elte.hu>

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> a new CPU is added. If the TSC isnt sync on SMP then it quickly gets 
> pretty messy, and we should rather take a look at /why/ these apps are 
> using RDTSC.
> 
> 	Ingo
> -

I use RDTSC in get a cheap method of measuring time. What other choices are
there for a low overhead high frequency time source?

By low overhead a kernel call is way to expensive, I want to minimally impact
the code and have many of these calls through out the code. One of the
ways I use it is to instrument multi-threaded applications and then use
the TSC to compare when actions occur between threads. i.e. I use it as a
time stamp counter and neither precision or accuracy is too important.
On the other hand the more precise and accurate the better:)

Cheers,

Wink Saville



  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-11-25  2:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-24 17:02 [patch] x86: unify/rewrite SMP TSC sync code Ingo Molnar
2006-11-24 17:13 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-24 20:25   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-24 20:37     ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-24 20:46       ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-24 21:06         ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-24 22:48     ` Ben Greear
2006-11-25  2:56     ` Wink Saville [this message]
2006-11-25  8:30       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-25 16:58         ` Wink Saville
2006-11-25 17:41           ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-25 20:34             ` Wink Saville
2006-11-27 19:00   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-29  7:13 ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found] <fa./NRPJg+JjfSQLUVwnX1GpHGIojQ@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.Y0RKABHd+7qnbGQYBAGPvlJ0Qic@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]   ` <fa.fD3WSpNqEJ4736vYzEak5Gf3xTw@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]     ` <fa.A+gkQAO1DLThaxJxPLPl3yE1CGo@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]       ` <fa.INurNKWdUKAEULTHyfpSW65a/Ng@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]         ` <fa.n9vySiI9RS2MCl0DZPDzxZEPiFw@ifi.uio.no>
2006-11-26  7:20           ` Robert Hancock
2006-11-26  8:16             ` Wink Saville
2006-11-26  8:24               ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-26 19:48                 ` Wink Saville
2006-11-27  7:51                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-27  9:15                     ` Wink Saville
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-27 17:23 Robert Crocombe
2006-11-27 18:41 ` Max Krasnyansky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4567B0CC.4030802@saville.com \
    --to=wink@saville.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox