From: Wink Saville <wink@saville.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: unify/rewrite SMP TSC sync code
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:56:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4567B0CC.4030802@saville.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061124202514.GA7608@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
>
> a new CPU is added. If the TSC isnt sync on SMP then it quickly gets
> pretty messy, and we should rather take a look at /why/ these apps are
> using RDTSC.
>
> Ingo
> -
I use RDTSC in get a cheap method of measuring time. What other choices are
there for a low overhead high frequency time source?
By low overhead a kernel call is way to expensive, I want to minimally impact
the code and have many of these calls through out the code. One of the
ways I use it is to instrument multi-threaded applications and then use
the TSC to compare when actions occur between threads. i.e. I use it as a
time stamp counter and neither precision or accuracy is too important.
On the other hand the more precise and accurate the better:)
Cheers,
Wink Saville
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-25 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-24 17:02 [patch] x86: unify/rewrite SMP TSC sync code Ingo Molnar
2006-11-24 17:13 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-24 20:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-24 20:37 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-24 20:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-24 21:06 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-24 22:48 ` Ben Greear
2006-11-25 2:56 ` Wink Saville [this message]
2006-11-25 8:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-25 16:58 ` Wink Saville
2006-11-25 17:41 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-25 20:34 ` Wink Saville
2006-11-27 19:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-29 7:13 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] <fa./NRPJg+JjfSQLUVwnX1GpHGIojQ@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.Y0RKABHd+7qnbGQYBAGPvlJ0Qic@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.fD3WSpNqEJ4736vYzEak5Gf3xTw@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.A+gkQAO1DLThaxJxPLPl3yE1CGo@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.INurNKWdUKAEULTHyfpSW65a/Ng@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.n9vySiI9RS2MCl0DZPDzxZEPiFw@ifi.uio.no>
2006-11-26 7:20 ` Robert Hancock
2006-11-26 8:16 ` Wink Saville
2006-11-26 8:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-26 19:48 ` Wink Saville
2006-11-27 7:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-27 9:15 ` Wink Saville
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-27 17:23 Robert Crocombe
2006-11-27 18:41 ` Max Krasnyansky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4567B0CC.4030802@saville.com \
--to=wink@saville.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox