Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework

[Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>]

Dmitry Mishin wrote:
> On Thursday 23 November 2006 05:39, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> Quoting Dmitry Mishin (dim@openvz.org):
>>> On Wednesday 22 November 2006 19:41, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>>>> Quoting Cedric Le Goater (clg@fr.ibm.com):
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> Dmitry Mishin wrote:
>>>>>> This patch looks acceptable for us.
>>>>> good. shall we merge it then ? see comment below.
>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, Daniel, we agreed to be based on the Andrey's patchset. I do
>>>>>> not see a reason, why Cedric force us to make some unnecessary work
>>>>>> and move existent patchset over his interface.
>>>>> yeah it's a bit different from andrey's but not that much and it's
>>>>> more in
>>>> Where is Andrey's patch?
>>> This thread - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/42666
>> Thanks, Dmitry.  Now I do recall seeing that before.
>>
>> That patchset appears to go part, but not all the way to fitting in with
>> the existing namespaces.  For instance, you use exit_task_namespaces() for
>> refcounting, but don't put the net_namespace in the nsproxy and use your
>> own mechanism for unsharing.
>>
>> It really seems useful to have all the namespaces be consistent whenever
>> practical, and I don't think your patchset would need much tweaking to
>> fit onto Cedric's patch.  Am I missing a complicating factor?
> No. I've already said, Cedric's patch is acceptable for us.

Do you mind if we port your patchset on top of this patch ? If you have 
no time for that I can do it.

  -- Daniel