From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>
To: Anderson Briglia <anderson.briglia@indt.org.br>
Cc: "Linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com"
<linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com>,
Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
"Aguiar Carlos (EXT-INdT/Manaus)" <carlos.aguiar@indt.org.br>,
ext David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
"Lizardo Anderson (EXT-INdT/Manaus)"
<anderson.lizardo@indt.org.br>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 5/5] [RFC] Add MMC Password Protection (lock/unlock) support V7: mmc_omap_dma.diff
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 22:20:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45709C93.7050709@drzeus.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <456AEB70.2000100@indt.org.br>
Anderson Briglia wrote:
>
> This patch is needed only for lock/unlock commands. So, it's necessary to
> make MMC omap works when using that feature. It's not a generic patch.
> But I can take off this one from the series and send after (if) the
> series
> is integrated.
>
The patches are marked "[RFC]" which I interpret as that I shouldn't
merge it. Is this incorrect?
>
> frame depends on data->blksz. When we were using data->blksz_bits
> everything was
> ok because we always had a multiple of 16 bits (2 bytes). Once a pwd
> can has a size
> not multiple of 2, the value must be rounded.
> According to MMC OMAP Technical Reference Manual, because of each DMA
> transfer is of
> equal size, it is necessary to have the block size of the transfer be
> a multiple of
> the DMA write access size (which is 2 bytes).
>
This sounds very generic and not something that is specific to the
password command.
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-01 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-22 14:54 [patch 5/5] [RFC] Add MMC Password Protection (lock/unlock) support V7: mmc_omap_dma.diff Anderson Briglia
2006-11-25 8:59 ` Pierre Ossman
2006-11-27 13:43 ` Anderson Briglia
2006-12-01 21:20 ` Pierre Ossman [this message]
2006-12-04 16:22 ` Anderson Briglia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45709C93.7050709@drzeus.cx \
--to=drzeus-list@drzeus.cx \
--cc=anderson.briglia@indt.org.br \
--cc=anderson.lizardo@indt.org.br \
--cc=carlos.aguiar@indt.org.br \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox