From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760033AbWLCTcZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Dec 2006 14:32:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760034AbWLCTcZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Dec 2006 14:32:25 -0500 Received: from h155.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:9993 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760033AbWLCTcY (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Dec 2006 14:32:24 -0500 Message-ID: <457326A2.2020402@ru.mvista.com> Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 22:33:54 +0300 From: Sergei Shtylyov Organization: MontaVista Software Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en-gb MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mingo@elte.hu Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dwalker@mvista.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt7: fix more issues with 32-bit cycles_t in latency_trace.c (take 3) References: <200611132252.58818.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> In-Reply-To: <200611132252.58818.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, I wrote: > In addition to the clock jump-back check being falsely triggered by clock wrap > with 32-bit cycles_t, as noticed by Kevin Hilman, there's another issue: using > %Lx format to print 32-bit values warrants erroneous values on 32-bit machines > like ARM and PPC32... > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov What was the destiny of that patch? I haven't seen it accepted, haven't seen any comments... while this is not a mere warning fix. What am I expected to do to get it accepted -- recast it against 2.6.19-rt1? > kernel/latency_trace.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) WBR, Sergei