public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@nortel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: additional oom-killer tuneable worth submitting?
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 12:30:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45785DDD.3000503@nortel.com> (raw)


The kernel currently has a way to adjust the oom-killer score via 
/proc/<pid>/oomadj.

However, to adjust this effectively requires knowledge of the scores of 
all the other processes on the system.

I'd like to float an idea (which we've implemented and been using for 
some time) where the semantics are slightly different:

We add a new "oom_thresh" member to the task struct.
We introduce a new proc entry "/proc/<pid>/oomthresh" to control it.

The "oom-thresh" value maps to the max expected memory consumption for 
that process.  As long as a process uses less memory than the specified 
threshold, then it is immune to the oom-killer.

On an embedded platform this allows the designer to engineer the system 
and protect critical apps based on their expected memory consumption. 
If one of those apps goes crazy and starts chewing additional memory 
then it becomes vulnerable to the oom killer while the other apps remain 
protected.

If a patch for the above feature was submitted, would there be any 
chance of getting it included?  Maybe controlled by a config option?

Chris

             reply	other threads:[~2006-12-07 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-07 18:30 Chris Friesen [this message]
2006-12-07 18:50 ` additional oom-killer tuneable worth submitting? Jesper Juhl
2006-12-07 21:25   ` Chris Friesen
2006-12-07 21:37     ` Jesper Juhl
2006-12-07 21:57       ` Chris Friesen
2006-12-07 22:25         ` Jesper Juhl
2006-12-07 19:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 21:26   ` Chris Friesen
2006-12-07 23:22 ` Alan
2006-12-07 23:21   ` Chris Friesen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-12-08 13:58 Al Boldi
2006-12-08 14:56 ` Alan
2006-12-08 15:19   ` Al Boldi
2006-12-08 15:55     ` Alan
2006-12-08 16:59       ` Al Boldi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45785DDD.3000503@nortel.com \
    --to=cfriesen@nortel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox