From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937074AbWLKQ1b (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:27:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S937072AbWLKQ1b (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:27:31 -0500 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:47331 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S937052AbWLKQ1a (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:27:30 -0500 Message-ID: <457D86F0.4020408@garzik.org> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:27:28 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Hancock CC: linux-kernel , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] sata_nv: add suspend/resume support References: <456E3ED5.3090201@shaw.ca> In-Reply-To: <456E3ED5.3090201@shaw.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.7 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.3 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Robert Hancock wrote: > +static void nv_remove_one (struct pci_dev *pdev) > +{ > + struct ata_host *host = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev); > + struct nv_host_priv *hpriv = host->private_data; > + > + kfree(hpriv); > + ata_pci_remove_one(pdev); > +} It is unwise to free the struct before the ports are even detached. Otherwise, seems ok, but I would like to see some more positive user reports (both ADMA and not) before pushing upstream. Jeff