public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pieter Palmers <pieterp@joow.be>
To: "Kristian Høgsberg" <krh@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] New firewire stack - updated patches
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:29:15 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <458956CB.7060004@joow.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061220005822.GB11746@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Here's a new set of patches for the new firewire stack.  The changes
> since the last set of patches address the issues that were raised on
> the list and can be reviewed in detail here:
.. for some reason I didn't get patch 3/4 and 4/4 on the linux1394-devel 
list, so I'll reply to this one.

I would suggest a reordering of the interrupt flag checks. Currently the 
interrupts that are least likely to occur are checked first. I don't see 
why. I would reorder the check such that ISO interrupts are checked 
first, as they have the most stringent timing constraints and are most 
likely to occur (when using ISO traffic).

After processing the ISO interrupts (and maybe the Async ones), a bypass 
could be inserted to exit the interrupt handler when there are no other 
interrupts to be handled. All other interrupts are to report relatively 
rare events or errors (error handling still to be added I assume). The 
effective run-length of the interrupt handler would be shorter using 
such a bypass, especially in the case where there is a lot of ISO traffic.

I'm looking forward to your ISO implementation, and I hope to 
incorporate it into FreeBob really fast.

Pieter

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-12-20 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-20  0:58 [PATCH 0/4] New firewire stack - updated patches Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-20 10:42 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-20 17:35   ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-20 18:57     ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-20 20:06       ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-20 21:52         ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-20 23:01           ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-20 20:34       ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-20 15:29 ` Pieter Palmers [this message]
2006-12-20 18:39   ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-21 23:03 ` Stefan Richter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-12-21 11:47 Duncan Beadnell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=458956CB.7060004@joow.be \
    --to=pieterp@joow.be \
    --cc=krh@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox