From: Pieter Palmers <pieterp@joow.be>
To: "Kristian Høgsberg" <krh@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] New firewire stack - updated patches
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:29:15 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <458956CB.7060004@joow.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061220005822.GB11746@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's a new set of patches for the new firewire stack. The changes
> since the last set of patches address the issues that were raised on
> the list and can be reviewed in detail here:
.. for some reason I didn't get patch 3/4 and 4/4 on the linux1394-devel
list, so I'll reply to this one.
I would suggest a reordering of the interrupt flag checks. Currently the
interrupts that are least likely to occur are checked first. I don't see
why. I would reorder the check such that ISO interrupts are checked
first, as they have the most stringent timing constraints and are most
likely to occur (when using ISO traffic).
After processing the ISO interrupts (and maybe the Async ones), a bypass
could be inserted to exit the interrupt handler when there are no other
interrupts to be handled. All other interrupts are to report relatively
rare events or errors (error handling still to be added I assume). The
effective run-length of the interrupt handler would be shorter using
such a bypass, especially in the case where there is a lot of ISO traffic.
I'm looking forward to your ISO implementation, and I hope to
incorporate it into FreeBob really fast.
Pieter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-20 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-20 0:58 [PATCH 0/4] New firewire stack - updated patches Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-20 10:42 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-20 17:35 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-20 18:57 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-20 20:06 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-20 21:52 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-20 23:01 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-20 20:34 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-20 15:29 ` Pieter Palmers [this message]
2006-12-20 18:39 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-21 23:03 ` Stefan Richter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-12-21 11:47 Duncan Beadnell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=458956CB.7060004@joow.be \
--to=pieterp@joow.be \
--cc=krh@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox