From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946030AbWLVKnZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2006 05:43:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946034AbWLVKnZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2006 05:43:25 -0500 Received: from hp3.statik.TU-Cottbus.De ([141.43.120.68]:41258 "EHLO hp3.statik.tu-cottbus.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946030AbWLVKnX (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2006 05:43:23 -0500 Message-ID: <458BB6CA.4080203@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:43:22 +0100 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061030 SeaMonkey/1.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: hot ejection of CardBus cards and ExpressCards Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Would-be driver programmer's question #217: How has a driver's remove routine to account for hot ejection of a PCI device? Does it merely boil down to that writing to device registers doesn't have side effects anymore or is there more to it? Thanks, -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-==- ==-- =-==- http://arcgraph.de/sr/