From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965128AbXADW0r (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:26:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965127AbXADW0r (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:26:47 -0500 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:33683 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965120AbXADW0q (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:26:46 -0500 Message-ID: <459D7F23.7010807@garzik.org> Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:26:43 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: Tejun Heo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCHSET] Managed device resources References: <1167146313307-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> <20070104221916.GI28445@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20070104221916.GI28445@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.7 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.3 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg KH wrote: > Hm, but I guess without the follow-up patches for libata, it will not > really get tested much. Jeff, if I accept this, what's your feelings of > letting libata be the "test bed" for it? It would be easiest for me to merge this through my libata-dev.git#upstream tree. That will auto-propagate it to -mm, and ensure that both base and libata bits are sent in one batch. Just shout if you see NAK-able bits... Work for you? Jeff