From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: "Patro, Sumant" <Sumant.Patro@lsi.com>
Cc: James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, akpm@osdl.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Kolli,
Neela" <Neela.Kolli@lsi.com>, "Yang, Bo" <Bo.Yang@lsi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid_{mm,mbox} init fix for kdump
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:50:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <459EE440.6070908@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0631C836DBF79F42B5A60C8C8D4E82298909B0@NAMAIL2.ad.lsil.com>
Patro, Sumant wrote:
> Hello Randy,
>
> At this time I am not trying to modify the function comment
> style of existing megaraid_mbox code. For the new function the
> description style is in sync with the preexisting code.
> So, I request for the patch to be accepted in its current
> submitted form.
I have no problem with that as long as you'll allow it to be
corrected to match kernel-doc syntax. Or don't use kernel-doc
syntax there at all.
> Regards,
>
> Sumant
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Dunlap [mailto:randy.dunlap@oracle.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 1:35 PM
> To: Patro, Sumant
> Cc: James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com; akpm@osdl.org;
> linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Kolli, Neela;
> Yang, Bo; Patro, Sumant
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid_{mm,mbox} init fix for kdump
>
> On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 07:10:09 -0800 Sumant Patro wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> ---
>>
>> Documentation/scsi/ChangeLog.megaraid | 16 ++
>> drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++-----
>> drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.h | 4
>> 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff -uprN linux-2.6.orig/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c
> linux-2.6.new/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c
> 2006-12-28 09:56:04.000000000 -0800
>> +++ linux-2.6.new/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c
> 2007-01-04 11:22:21.000000000 -0800
>> @@ -3380,6 +3386,84 @@ megaraid_mbox_flush_cache(adapter_t *ada
>>
>>
>> /**
>> + * megaraid_mbox_fire_sync_cmd - fire the sync cmd
>> + * @param adapter : soft state for the controller
>
> That (above) should just be:
> * @adapter: (plus its description; the description there
> doesn't seem to agree with its parameter name).
>
>
>> + *
>> + * Clears the pending cmds in FW and reinits its RAID structs */
>> +static int megaraid_mbox_fire_sync_cmd(adapter_t *adapter) {
>> + mbox_t *mbox;
>> + uint8_t raw_mbox[sizeof(mbox_t)];
>> + mraid_device_t *raid_dev = ADAP2RAIDDEV(adapter);
>> + mbox64_t *mbox64;
>> + int status = 0;
>> + int i;
>> + uint32_t dword;
>> +
>> + mbox = (mbox_t *)raw_mbox;
>> +
>> + memset((caddr_t)raw_mbox, 0, sizeof(mbox_t));
>> +
>> + raw_mbox[0] = 0xFF;
>> +
>> + mbox64 = raid_dev->mbox64;
>> + mbox = raid_dev->mbox;
>> +
>> + /* Wait until mailbox is free */
>> + if (megaraid_busywait_mbox(raid_dev) != 0) {
>> + status = 1;
>> + goto blocked_mailbox;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Copy mailbox data into host structure */
>> + memcpy((caddr_t)mbox, (caddr_t)raw_mbox, 16);
>> + mbox->cmdid = 0xFE;
>> + mbox->busy = 1;
>> + mbox->poll = 0;
>> + mbox->ack = 0;
>> + mbox->numstatus = 0;
>> + mbox->status = 0;
>> +
>> + wmb();
>> + WRINDOOR(raid_dev, raid_dev->mbox_dma | 0x1);
>> +
>> + /* Wait for maximum 1 min for status to post.
>> + * If the Firmware SUPPORTS the ABOVE COMMAND,
>> + * mbox->cmd will be set to 0
>> + * else
>> + * the firmware will reject the command with
>> + * mbox->numstatus set to 1
>> + */
>> +
>> + i = 0;
>> + status = 0;
>> + while (!mbox->numstatus && mbox->cmd == 0xFF) {
>> + rmb();
>> + msleep(1);
>> + i++;
>> + if (i > 1000 * 60) {
>> + status = 1;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + if (mbox->numstatus == 1)
>> + status = 1; /*cmd not supported*/
>> +
>> + /* Check for interrupt line */
>> + dword = RDOUTDOOR(raid_dev);
>> + WROUTDOOR(raid_dev, dword);
>> + WRINDOOR(raid_dev,2);
>> +
>> + return status;
>> +
>> +blocked_mailbox:
>> + con_log(CL_ANN, (KERN_WARNING "megaraid: blocked mailbox\n"));
>> + return status;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> * megaraid_mbox_display_scb - display SCB information, mostly debug
> purposes
>> * @param adapter : controllers' soft state
>> * @param scb : SCB to be displayed
>
> I haven't looked at the entire source file, but these extra "param"
> words should not be there. kernel-doc syntax is just
> @name: description
>
>
> ---
> ~Randy
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-05 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-05 23:47 [PATCH] scsi: megaraid_{mm,mbox} init fix for kdump Patro, Sumant
2007-01-05 23:50 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-01-05 15:10 Sumant Patro
2007-01-05 21:34 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-01-31 17:49 ` Matthias Urlichs
2007-01-03 2:37 [Patch] scsi: megaraid_{mm,mbox}: " Patro, Sumant
2006-12-29 16:02 Sumant Patro
2006-12-29 21:37 ` Randy Dunlap
2006-12-30 14:31 ` Douglas Gilbert
2006-12-30 15:38 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=459EE440.6070908@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=Bo.Yang@lsi.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=Neela.Kolli@lsi.com \
--cc=Sumant.Patro@lsi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox