From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk>
Cc: LKML Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
jgarzik@pobox.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: libata error handling
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 13:01:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <459FF1F8.1050306@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1168109874.1512.11.camel@localhost>
Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 12:21 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
>> Kasper Sandberg wrote:
>>> i have heard that libata has much better error handling (this is what
>>> made me try it), and from initial observations, that appears to be very
>>> true, however, im wondering, is there something i can do to get
>>> extremely verbose information from libata? for example if it corrects
>>> errors? cause i'd really like to know if it still happens, and if i
>>> perhaps get corruption as before, even though not severe.
>> Any errors, timeouts or retries would be showing up in dmesg..
> how sure can i be of this? is it 100% sure that i have not encountered
> this error then?
Pretty sure, I'm quite certain libata never does any silent error recovery..
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-06 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.pdj7pJD9C08bRZatFINV1hz1oyA@ifi.uio.no>
2007-01-06 18:21 ` libata error handling Robert Hancock
2007-01-06 18:57 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-01-06 19:01 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2007-01-06 19:08 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-01-06 19:28 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-01-07 20:07 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-01-07 20:38 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-01-06 14:26 Kasper Sandberg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-29 5:06 [RFC][PATCH] libata ATAPI alignment Jeff Garzik
2005-08-07 5:48 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-19 3:49 ` libata error handling Jeff Garzik
2005-08-19 5:40 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-19 5:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-19 19:00 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-08-19 18:46 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-08-19 19:38 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-08-19 20:03 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-08-19 20:11 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-08-19 20:43 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-08-19 21:10 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-08-19 22:37 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-08-19 20:29 ` Mike Anderson
2005-08-19 21:02 ` Luben Tuikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=459FF1F8.1050306@shaw.ca \
--to=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@metanurb.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox