From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751723AbXAPWbA (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:31:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751735AbXAPWbA (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:31:00 -0500 Received: from farad.aurel32.net ([82.232.2.251]:2601 "EHLO mail.aurel32.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751719AbXAPWa7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:30:59 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 2885 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:30:59 EST Message-ID: <45AD46DD.7050408@aurel32.net> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:42:53 +0100 From: Aurelien Jarno User-Agent: IceDove 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061220) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: IPv6 router advertisement broken on 2.6.20-rc5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, I have just tried a 2.6.20-rc5 kernel (I previously used a 2.6.19 one), and I have noticed that the IPv6 router advertisement functionality is broken. The interface is not attributed an IPv6 address anymore, despite /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/ra_accept being set to 1 (also true for each individual interface configuration). Using tcpdump, I am seeing the router advertisement messages arriving on the interface, but they seems to be ignored. Does somebody have also seen this behaviour? Bye, Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' aurel32@debian.org | aurelien@aurel32.net `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net