From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932189AbXAVSRi (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:17:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932193AbXAVSRi (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:17:38 -0500 Received: from h155.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:35993 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932180AbXAVSRg (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:17:36 -0500 Message-ID: <45B4FFBD.40507@ru.mvista.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:17:33 +0300 From: Sergei Shtylyov Organization: MontaVista Software Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en-gb MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] ide: fix UDMA/MWDMA/SWDMA masks References: <20070119003058.14846.43637.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20070119003226.14846.87052.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20070119003226.14846.87052.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello. Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > [PATCH] ide: fix UDMA/MWDMA/SWDMA masks > * use 0x00 instead of 0x80 to disable ->{ultra,mwdma,swdma}_mask > * add udma_mask field to ide_pci_device_t and use it to initialize > ->ultra_mask in aec62xx, pdc202xx_new and pdc202xx_old drivers > * fix UDMA masks to match with chipset specific *_ratemask() > (alim15x3, hpt366, serverworks and siimage drivers need UDMA mask > filtering method - done in the next patch) More issues with aec62xx.c driver, found after looking at the next patch... > Index: b/drivers/ide/pci/aec62xx.c > =================================================================== > --- a/drivers/ide/pci/aec62xx.c > +++ b/drivers/ide/pci/aec62xx.c > @@ -270,11 +270,13 @@ static unsigned int __devinit init_chips > > static void __devinit init_hwif_aec62xx(ide_hwif_t *hwif) > { > + struct pci_dev *dev = hwif->pci_dev; > + > hwif->autodma = 0; > hwif->tuneproc = &aec62xx_tune_drive; > hwif->speedproc = &aec62xx_tune_chipset; > > - if (hwif->pci_dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_ARTOP_ATP850UF) > + if (dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_ARTOP_ATP850UF) > hwif->serialized = hwif->channel; > > if (hwif->mate) > @@ -286,7 +288,16 @@ static void __devinit init_hwif_aec62xx( > return; > } > > - hwif->ultra_mask = 0x7f; > + hwif->ultra_mask = hwif->cds->udma_mask; > + > + /* atp865 and atp865r */ > + if (hwif->ultra_mask == 0x3f) { > + unsigned long io = pci_resource_start(dev, 4); > + > + if (inb(io) & 0x10) > + hwif->ultra_mask = 0x7f; /* udma0-6 */ > + } > + Looks like another intruduced buglet: you're reading DMA command, but aec62xx_ratemask() was reading DMA status originally for this bit. > hwif->mwdma_mask = 0x07; > hwif->swdma_mask = 0x07; Hm, caught another nit: this driver doesn't actually support single-word DMA modes... :-) > Index: b/drivers/ide/pci/alim15x3.c > =================================================================== > --- a/drivers/ide/pci/alim15x3.c > +++ b/drivers/ide/pci/alim15x3.c > @@ -765,8 +765,17 @@ static void __devinit init_hwif_common_a > > hwif->atapi_dma = 1; > > - if (m5229_revision > 0x20) > - hwif->ultra_mask = 0x7f; > + if (m5229_revision <= 0x20) > + hwif->ultra_mask = 0x00; /* no udma */ > + else if (m5229_revision < 0xC2) > + hwif->ultra_mask = 0x07; /* udma0-2 */ > + else if (m5229_revision == 0xC2 || m5229_revision == 0xC3) > + hwif->ultra_mask = 0x1f; /* udma0-4 */ > + else if (m5229_revision == 0xC4) > + hwif->ultra_mask = 0x3f; /* udma0-5 */ > + else > + hwif->ultra_mask = 0x7f; /* udma0-6 */ > + > hwif->mwdma_mask = 0x07; > hwif->swdma_mask = 0x07; Ugh, I'm not seeing any *actual* support for MW/SW DMA in this driver... And PIO setting via speedproc() method is broken -- it passes to tuneproc() method mode number not biased by -XFER_PIO_0 beforehand. Will cook up some patch, maybe... :-/ MBR, Sergei