From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] i386: add option to show more code in oops reports
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:40:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45BE1561.6000303@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200701290444.21861.ak@suse.de>
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Friday 26 January 2007 00:56, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>
>
>> Can't think of a way to word the justification, but I've wanted to see more
>> code a few times.
>>
>
> Hmm, not sure I see the point. The Code line is just that you can
> make sense of random mailing list oopses where you don't
> have a vmlinux. But as long as you don't make the option
> the default you would need to ask people to set it for you -- and when you
> ask you could always as well ask about the vmlinux and get
> as much code as you ever wanted.
>
This was patch inspired by my finding out that code in the running
kernel might have
been modified at runtime by some strange bug, and looking at vmlinux
might not be
helpful.
See:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/24/143
> So unless it's default it's likely useless and I don't think
> it is a good idea to make it default because oops screen estate
> is so precious.
>
Yeah, there's no way it could be the default. But I'd like to see if
Alistair John Strachan's
running kernel matches the vmlinux he posted with that strange
unexplained oops.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-29 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-24 20:22 [patch] i386: add option to show more code in oops reports Chuck Ebbert
2007-01-25 22:55 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-25 23:56 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-01-29 3:44 ` Andi Kleen
2007-01-29 15:40 ` Chuck Ebbert [this message]
2007-01-29 18:03 ` Andi Kleen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-01-29 20:11 Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45BE1561.6000303@redhat.com \
--to=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox