From: Yavuz Onder <yavuz@teksavvy.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: yavuz@teksavvy.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.19.2: bad reads/writes from/to CMOS clock
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:37:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45BEA162.3030204@teksavvy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e18e56a85195bf4a507163df8e2f62e@teksavvy.com>
I have since found out that SMP kernels should(must?) have Enhanced RTC
support built-in.
It is stated in kernel config help for Enhanced RTC support, and I found
a number of references on the net as well.
Now I wonder why selecting SMP does not set Enhanced RTC support to "Y"
automatically?
I am building a kernel right now, and will monitor for a week or so,
then come back and report if it removes the problem.
Yavuz
yavuz@teksavvy.com wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am running 2.6.19.2 kernel from kernel.org.
>
> This is my first SMP kernel.
>
> The problem I describe below has not happend with non-SMP kernels ever...
>
> I have installed my new AMD64 x2 4800 CPU just a few days ago. My mobo is Asus A8N SLI
> (Nvidia chipset).
>
> My problem with this new setup is that my CMOS clock is thrown off by varying
> amounts of time. I have seen system times as long as ten months into future, and as
> long as 25 days in the past. At the moment my system clock has correct
> hh:mm:ss, but it shows the date Jan 1st, instead of correct 25th.
>
> In last few days have systematically checked CMOS clock after shutdown and before
> boot-up.
>
> I have observed CMOS clock set to a wrong value, immediately after shutdown.
> I also ended up with a wrong system time following a boot after verifying
> correctness of the CMOS clock.
>
> Problem does not happen 100% of the time. But 6-7 times in a week is bad
> enough.
>
> I searched mailing list archives, and found some NMI-RTC race condition discussion,
> and some other discussions about timers not running, clock ticks being missed
> etc. But they were all at least one year old. The fixes to those should have found
> their way into 2.6.19 kernels.
>
> I would appreciate any ideas on how to follow-up on this problem.
>
> I am eager to try things, collect data as needed. Just tell me what to do.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
>
> Yavuz Onder
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-30 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-26 14:46 2.6.19.2: bad reads/writes from/to CMOS clock yavuz
2007-01-26 21:01 ` [x86-64, CMOS/RTC] " Oleg Verych
2007-01-30 1:37 ` Yavuz Onder [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45BEA162.3030204@teksavvy.com \
--to=yavuz@teksavvy.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox