Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

Martin Bligh
2007-01-30T03:26:06Z

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:12:31 +0530
> Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:01:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:56:08 -0800
>>> "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> - It seems that people have been busy creating the need for this. I had to
>>>>> apply over sixty patches to this tree to fix post-2.6.20-rc4-mm1 compilation
>>>>> errors. And a number of patches were dropped due to no-compile or to
>>>>> runtime errors. Heaven knows how many runtime bugs were added.
>>>> dbench seems to panic on xfs / cfq ?
>>> OK, I'll dump git-block.patch. That means that the fsaio patches get
>>> temporarily dropped as well as they depend on git-block changes somewhat.
>> Would you like me to rework these back again to not depend on git-block ?
>
> Is OK thanks, I now have a git-block minus CFQ changes, so I have restored the fsaio
> patches.

On a happy note - mm2 seems to pass testing much better ;-)

M.