* New module-init-tools pre-release (v3.3-pre6)
@ 2007-02-01 6:28 Jon Masters
2007-02-01 7:17 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jon Masters @ 2007-02-01 6:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Yo,
I took over upstream maintainership of the module-init-tools package
from Rusty at the end of last year. At this point, there's a public
wiki, new pre-release, bugzilla and all that jazz up and running:
http://www.kerneltools.org/ has links to the latest release.
There's a mailing list, etc. and most of us involved in m-i-t
development seem to have already noticed, but just in case, I'm sending
this reminder out to LKML now. I don't plan on shouting about every
minor release from this point on - unless it's critically serious.
If you've got any patches (preferably git trees), let me know.
Jon.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: New module-init-tools pre-release (v3.3-pre6)
2007-02-01 6:28 New module-init-tools pre-release (v3.3-pre6) Jon Masters
@ 2007-02-01 7:17 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-01 8:10 ` Jon Masters
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2007-02-01 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Masters; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:28:59 -0500 Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org> wrote:
> I took over upstream maintainership of the module-init-tools package
> from Rusty at the end of last year.
Cool. A patch to the kernel's ./MAINTAINERS would be appreciated.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: New module-init-tools pre-release (v3.3-pre6)
2007-02-01 7:17 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2007-02-01 8:10 ` Jon Masters
2007-02-01 8:34 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jon Masters @ 2007-02-01 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Jon Masters, linux-kernel
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:17:31PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:28:59 -0500 Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org> wrote:
> > I took over upstream maintainership of the module-init-tools package
> > from Rusty at the end of last year.
> Cool. A patch to the kernel's ./MAINTAINERS would be appreciated.
Sent a patch against the MODULE SUPPORT entry in MAINTAINERS since I
guess that's the existing entry you're refering to.
Jon.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: New module-init-tools pre-release (v3.3-pre6)
2007-02-01 8:10 ` Jon Masters
@ 2007-02-01 8:34 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-01 8:46 ` Jon Masters
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2007-02-01 8:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Masters; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:10:36 +0000 Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:17:31PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:28:59 -0500 Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org> wrote:
> > > I took over upstream maintainership of the module-init-tools package
> > > from Rusty at the end of last year.
>
> > Cool. A patch to the kernel's ./MAINTAINERS would be appreciated.
>
> Sent a patch against the MODULE SUPPORT entry in MAINTAINERS since I
> guess that's the existing entry you're refering to.
>
No, I was thinking of a record which explicitly mentions module-init-tools.
It's not a part of the kernel, but it is closely connected to it, and this is
useful information to have in ./MAINTAINERS.
The patch you sent claims that you maintain kernel/module.c.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: New module-init-tools pre-release (v3.3-pre6)
2007-02-01 8:34 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2007-02-01 8:46 ` Jon Masters
2007-02-01 23:21 ` Rusty Russell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jon Masters @ 2007-02-01 8:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel
Andrew Morton wrote:
> No, I was thinking of a record which explicitly mentions module-init-tools.
> It's not a part of the kernel, but it is closely connected to it, and this is
> useful information to have in ./MAINTAINERS.
Ah, now that makes more sense. I was thinking you were thinking of an
existing entry. Meh, anyway, way too late in the evening for thought.
> The patch you sent claims that you maintain kernel/module.c.
Indeed, which I don't want to. Rusty can keep that one for now :-)
Jon.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: New module-init-tools pre-release (v3.3-pre6)
2007-02-01 8:46 ` Jon Masters
@ 2007-02-01 23:21 ` Rusty Russell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2007-02-01 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Masters; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 03:46 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > The patch you sent claims that you maintain kernel/module.c.
>
> Indeed, which I don't want to. Rusty can keep that one for now :-)
Thanks 8)
BTW, just chiming in to officially ack Jon's handover of the overgrown
example code known as module-init-tools.
Cheers!
Rusty.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-01 23:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-02-01 6:28 New module-init-tools pre-release (v3.3-pre6) Jon Masters
2007-02-01 7:17 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-01 8:10 ` Jon Masters
2007-02-01 8:34 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-01 8:46 ` Jon Masters
2007-02-01 23:21 ` Rusty Russell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox