public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>
To: TJ <linux@tjworld.net>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] filesystem: Disk Errors at boot-time caused by probe of partitions
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 14:12:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45C23BAA.5050400@cfl.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1170329269.30563.10.camel@butch.lan.tjworld.net>

I think you may be barking up the wrong tree because IIRC, these 
requests for data beyond the end of the disk never make it to the drive; 
the kernel fails them in the block layer.  There was a patch a while 
back to fix the partition detection code to NOT request sectors beyond 
the end of the disk, but I don't think it was ever merged.

In any case, if you are sure the requests are making it to the drive and 
causing damage, I hope you give Maxtor and IBM a sound thrashing for 
using retarded firmware.

TJ wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> 
> Yes, I'd have expected that too. I'm particularly surprised the
> drive-logic doesn't refuse to move the heads and just report the failure
> based on the LBA value.
> 
> These are Maxtor drives, but its also happened with IBM drives in
> another system with similar configuration, as a test.
> 
> During the bug-hunt (which started end of December) I built about 100
> kernels trying to track down the root cause, and therefore went through
> many reboot cycles.
> 
> Several times the drives were 'knocked out' and would refuse to
> initialise during POST. The only remedy was to leave the system powered
> down for a while - the rest seemed to do them good.
> 
> The difficulty I had in debugging was the errors are generated on the
> work-queue and interrupt handling side, and it was extremely difficult
> to pin-point the root cause because the symptoms (drive seek errors)
> occur well after the partition tables have been scanned, and also repeat
> themselves several times during system start-up.


  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-01 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <fa.vUjkpPQXmle+uox6D228qG85KCU@ifi.uio.no>
2007-02-01  4:20 ` [PATCH 1/1] filesystem: Disk Errors at boot-time caused by probe of partitions Robert Hancock
2007-02-01 11:27   ` TJ
2007-02-01 19:12     ` Phillip Susi [this message]
2007-02-01 20:42       ` Alan
2007-02-01  1:50 TJ
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-01-31 23:50 TJ
2007-02-01 22:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-01 22:47   ` Eric D. Mudama
2007-02-01 23:50   ` TJ
2007-02-02  0:10     ` Eric D. Mudama
2007-02-02  0:25       ` TJ

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45C23BAA.5050400@cfl.rr.com \
    --to=psusi@cfl.rr.com \
    --cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@tjworld.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox