From: "Markus Rechberger" <markus.rechberger@amd.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] x86-64 ext2/ext3 datestamp problem
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:33:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45C8F419.5040103@amd.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 640 bytes --]
Hi,
there is an issue with ext2/ext3 date stamps, if someone creates a file
with a timestamp between 1902 and 1970(epoch 0) it will overflow and
result in a higher date than 2038.
$ touch --date "1905-01-01" test
$ ls -lah test
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jan 1 1905 test (this is a cached value here)
(remount the partition/clear the cache)
$ ls -lah test
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Feb 6 2041 test
10000101101111001100011001110000 .. -2051226000 (1905)
10000101101111001100011001110000 .. 2243741296 (2041)
this was tested against linus git tree
Markus
--
Markus Rechberger
Operating System Research Center
AMD Saxony LLC & Co. KG
[-- Attachment #2: inode.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1655 bytes --]
diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c
index dd4e14c..9fa1bd6 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c
@@ -1079,9 +1079,9 @@ void ext2_read_inode (struct inode * inode)
}
inode->i_nlink = le16_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_links_count);
inode->i_size = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_size);
- inode->i_atime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_atime);
- inode->i_ctime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_ctime);
- inode->i_mtime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_mtime);
+ inode->i_atime.tv_sec = (signed)le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_atime);
+ inode->i_ctime.tv_sec = (signed)le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_ctime);
+ inode->i_mtime.tv_sec = (signed)le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_mtime);
inode->i_atime.tv_nsec = inode->i_mtime.tv_nsec = inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec = 0;
ei->i_dtime = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_dtime);
/* We now have enough fields to check if the inode was active or not.
diff --git a/fs/ext3/inode.c b/fs/ext3/inode.c
index beaf25f..5d171c0 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext3/inode.c
@@ -2673,9 +2673,9 @@ void ext3_read_inode(struct inode * inode)
}
inode->i_nlink = le16_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_links_count);
inode->i_size = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_size);
- inode->i_atime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_atime);
- inode->i_ctime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_ctime);
- inode->i_mtime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_mtime);
+ inode->i_atime.tv_sec = (signed)le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_atime);
+ inode->i_ctime.tv_sec = (signed)le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_ctime);
+ inode->i_mtime.tv_sec = (signed)le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_mtime);
inode->i_atime.tv_nsec = inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec = inode->i_mtime.tv_nsec = 0;
ei->i_state = 0;
next reply other threads:[~2007-02-06 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-06 21:33 Markus Rechberger [this message]
2007-02-06 21:40 ` [patch] x86-64 ext2/ext3 datestamp problem Markus Rechberger
2007-02-06 21:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-06 21:57 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-02-06 22:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-06 22:07 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-02-06 22:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-06 22:23 ` Markus Rechberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45C8F419.5040103@amd.com \
--to=markus.rechberger@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox