Re: [PATCH 3/3] rcutorture: Remove redundant assignment to cur_ops in for loop

[Josh Triplett <josh@kernel.org>]

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 16:22:28 -0800
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> I suspect we can do better than that...
[...]

Much better; please go ahead and replace my patch with this one.

Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@kernel.org>

- Josh Triplett

> --- a/kernel/rcutorture.c~rcutorture-remove-redundant-assignment-to-cur_ops-in
> +++ a/kernel/rcutorture.c
> @@ -569,10 +569,6 @@ static struct rcu_torture_ops sched_ops 
>  	.name = "sched"
>  };
>  
> -static struct rcu_torture_ops *torture_ops[] =
> -	{ &rcu_ops, &rcu_sync_ops, &rcu_bh_ops, &rcu_bh_sync_ops,
> -	  &srcu_ops, &qrcu_ops, &sched_ops, NULL };
> -
>  /*
>   * RCU torture writer kthread.  Repeatedly substitutes a new structure
>   * for that pointed to by rcu_torture_current, freeing the old structure
> @@ -939,16 +935,17 @@ rcu_torture_init(void)
>  	int i;
>  	int cpu;
>  	int firsterr = 0;
> +	static struct rcu_torture_ops *torture_ops[] =
> +		{ &rcu_ops, &rcu_sync_ops, &rcu_bh_ops, &rcu_bh_sync_ops,
> +		  &srcu_ops, &qrcu_ops, &sched_ops, };
>  
>  	/* Process args and tell the world that the torturer is on the job. */
> -
> -	for (i = 0; cur_ops = torture_ops[i], cur_ops; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(torture_ops); i++) {
>  		cur_ops = torture_ops[i];
> -		if (strcmp(torture_type, cur_ops->name) == 0) {
> +		if (strcmp(torture_type, cur_ops->name) == 0)
>  			break;
> -		}
>  	}
> -	if (cur_ops == NULL) {
> +	if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(torture_ops)) {
>  		printk(KERN_ALERT "rcutorture: invalid torture type: \"%s\"\n",
>  		       torture_type);
>  		return (-EINVAL);
> _
> 
> 
>