From: Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@student.ltu.se>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/aic7xxx_old: Convert to generic boolean-values
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:35:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45CE2C8C.80306@student.ltu.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1171132062.3373.31.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 18:46 +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
>
>> Convert:
>> FALSE -> false
>> TRUE -> true
>>
>
> Actually, downcasing true and false in this driver is pretty much a
> retrograde step. The reason for their being uppercased is that they
> represent constants (and uppercase is the traditional defined constant
> specifier).
>
I would argue that 'false' and 'true' are values and not constants, but
further more C99 is defining them in lowercase (stdbool.h).
> When discussion about TRUE and FALSE came up a long time a go in the
> context of the mid layer we agreed to strip the defined constants out of
> that code and just go with 1 and 0 inline ... because the code was
> pretty much being rewritten. We also decided to encourage but not force
> the driver writers simply to use 1 and 0 as well ... a lot of people are
> deeply wedded to the TRUE and FALSE defines, it turned out.
>
As I have expressed before, I don't understand why people seem to
dislike 'false'/'true' but anyway, since you seem to approve booleans,
would it be possible to convert the obvious variables/functions into
boolean-type?
Richard Knutsson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-10 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-10 17:46 [PATCH] drivers/scsi/aic7xxx_old: Convert to generic boolean-values Richard Knutsson
2007-02-10 18:27 ` James Bottomley
2007-02-10 20:35 ` Richard Knutsson [this message]
2007-02-10 20:43 ` Richard Knutsson
2007-02-12 20:27 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-16 16:42 ` James Bottomley
2007-02-16 18:04 ` Richard Knutsson
2007-02-16 18:23 ` James Bottomley
2007-02-16 19:10 ` Richard Knutsson
2007-02-16 18:34 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-16 18:42 ` James Bottomley
2007-02-16 18:50 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-16 21:43 ` Doug Ledford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45CE2C8C.80306@student.ltu.se \
--to=ricknu-0@student.ltu.se \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox